Here’s Hoping for a Happy New Year!

Here’s hoping for a Happy New Year!

New Year, whichever and whenever it occurs for you, offers space for reflection as well as projection. The Gregorian calendar fixes ours as 1st January each year, irrespective of the position of the sun or the moon, but close enough to the winter solstice to symbolise new light and fresh beginnings.
New Year is worthy of a wish list, fresh aspirations. In a human world of significant turmoil and uncertainty, so much needs fixing that it’s difficult to prioritise. But here goes. Let’s hope in 2026:

  1. The fascist-led racist movements of Farage and Yaxley-Lennon are finally and overwhelmingly defeated by mass mobilisations of working class people outraged by racism and misogyny and challenging the false culture-wars that decry empathy as weakness;
  2. The £13billion a year UK tax-funding for illegal nuclear weapons of indiscriminate mass-destruction is ended, the cash transferred into the National Health Service to fully fund our health and welfare needs rather than warfare. Let’s also ensure an anti-racist campaign in hospitals to value the one-in-three doctors working here from oversees, and encourage our health staff to stay because we value, not abuse, them. Oh, and ensure the NHS is protected from plans to fully privatise our services – the selling of our health records to the private corporation Palantir to be roundly rejected;
  3. An emergency plan for funding to address the housing crisis, including skills apprenticeships for our unemployed young people, for good quality new build of social housing and refurbishment of our 13 million homes in need of repair and insulation, placing rent caps and legal liabilities on private landlords and taxing large landlords to fund the reparations they should have undertaken;
  4. The end of this seemingly endless period of Austerity economics, where workers wages have stagnated since the banking crisis of 2008, our real spending-power actually fallen despite our taxes bailing out the banks without any prosecutions or detriment to the bankers incomes, dividends and bonuses. End the low wage long working hours culture where employers are subsidised by our taxes to keep our wages low. Make the rich pay proportionally the same taxes as the working class instead of being allowed to hide their riches in off-shore accounts;
  5. The acceleration, depth and seriousness of the Climate Crisis is finally accepted and understood, all the lies and denial defeated and replaced by urgent action to end emissions from the burning of fossil fuels, Britain playing a lead role on the international stage to force climate action onto the US Presidency and win funding for the vital transformation of the world economy away from oil and gas and into funded renewable energy delivery North and South. Stop subsidising the oil companies who are reaping record profits from inflated prices causing our fuel poverty;
  6. Child poverty is ended, the 1 in 3 working class kids no longer deprived of some of the basics of life, and our schools refunded under state control;
  7. The genocidal racist Netanyahu is brought to trial and jailed, his far-Right government collapsed. Starmer’s Government support for Zionism and funding of arms to Israel is ended, the protesters against the persecution of Palestinians vindicated and applauded.
    There are so many more issues that must be addressed. Well, we have to live in hope. We are in a period of very fast moving human history, and nothing is impossible. The course of human history has always been determined by the mass movements of working people, not the feeble compromises of the self-promoting political class.
    Best wishes for a campaigning New Year for Peace with Social Justice!
Screenshot

Gaza Deal is a Lie

Here’s the original unedited version (900 words) with the printed version (max 600) beneath.

So President Trump has proclaimed Peace in the Middle East and the end of the violence against the people of Gaza! Why, then, did 600,000 people march through London last weekend calling for Freedom for Palestine? They’ve won, haven’t they?
No! This ceasefire is a respite, the third ceasefire in the two-years of assault upon Gaza. It does not represent peace or justice. It is not a Peace Agreement. Despite all living hostages being released, Israel has not agreed that this is a permanent ceasefire. Medical workers, doctors and nurses arrested without charge during the destruction of the hospitals of Gaza are not being released from detention. Gaza has no electricity, neither water nor sanitation, almost no food, medical supplies or any basic infrastructure whatsoever. No economy. At least 180,000 Palestinians dead including 20,000 children, 5 times that injured, the entire Gazan population of two-million traumatised.
The seige conditions that may be be lifted were always illegitimate, inhuman and illegal under international law. Netanyahu’s Israeli Defence Force has violated one international law after another and is not withdrawing from Gaza. Netanyahu is a war criminal yet applauded by the most powerful rulers of the world. The Israeli State refuses to recognise Palestine and cannot be trusted.
The first phase of the Peace Plan has no timetables and has no plan for self-determination or even representative government for the Palestinian people. The Board of Peace chaired by the President of the United States of America is now unlikely to be administered by Tony Blair, an architect of the illegal invasion of Iraq, and equally unlikely to replace the Israeli occupation with an international military force. In any case, Israel will maintain a security perimeter to Gaza’s borders, ensuring a militarised open-air impoverished prison.
Any Palestinian civil authority will be fragmented and disempowered. The plan does not include any plan for reparations for the wholesale destruction of Gaza by Israel, and no accountability for Netanyahu’s war crimes. There will be no dismantling of all the Israeli settlements in and around Palestine’s West Bank – the larger part of Palestine not even recognised by the Trump Deal – gained by force and ethnic cleaning and declared illegal over decades by the United Nations Council. There’s no right-of-return for any of the 8 million Palestinian diaspora – those already forced from their own land and living in exile.
Previous agreements surrounding Gaza, for example at Camp David or the Oslo accords, have been signed and then discarded by Israel. Earlier this year, the Real-Estate billionaire Steve Witkoff organised a deal accepted by not only by Hamas but a wide range of different regional liberation groups representing a much broader cross-section of Palestinian society. They all signed the Witkoff Deal on August 18th, only to have the entire negotiating team of Hamas targeted by Israeli air strikes hours later, bombing buildings in Doha, Qatar but failing to kill Hamas leaders. Israel can’t be trusted.
Trump’s Plan is neo-colonialist. The racist apartheid military state of Israel wants the entire surrender and subjugation of the people of Gaza. Israel is creating open-air concentration camps of the most intense poverty, heavily restricting water and food aid as well as maintaining a visible and palpable atmosphere of disempowerment and fear. For the Zionist ultra-right nationalists, the Palestinian people are still the target for complete extermination, Palestine to be erased from the map and from history.
This short pause is better than nothing. A respite. But it’s not over. No people can agree and sign-up for the end of their very existence. Israel remains wholly entrenched in Gaza. The people are traumatised and immiserised but have not surrendered. The potential for a viable Palestinian State, as already recognised by the UK and 148 other nations, is further away than the serious opportunity for “a land for all” – a secular and multicultural democratic state from the river to the sea.
The Israeli people may not like Netanyahu but show no wish for a Palestinian State. The loss of support for Israel by the majority of people across the West and further afield is extensive and irreparable. Our protests have made Israel a pariah State.
Gaza represents the most barbarous peak of the logic of the system we are all subjected to. The brutality of Capitalism. Why does no-one ask for Israel to disarm? Why is Israel allowed to produce, site, arm and aim nuclear weapons, threatening their imminent use, whilst all others in the region are banned? Why is the single-ethnicity state of Israel allowed to maintain an Apartheid constitution when the world previously damned and deposed the Apartheid State of South Africa?
The answers are two-fold: the ideological commitment of western politicians to the racist elitist tenets of Zionism, and the capitalist economics clawing at the wealth of the region through imperialist militarism. So the genocide in Gaza has awoken peoples across the world to the nature of Israel and imperialism. There is a movement of millions across five continents that is focussed upon challenging Israel.
This week’s meetings of the most powerful politicans and Corporate directors in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, will include business talks to carve-up the beach-front property rights and the gas and oil extraction off the coast. Trump wants this deal because he wants-in on the Gaza Riviera property developments, and his negotiators are in on the scam.
We can’t easily access these facts of what’s happening. Trump’s friends, centibillionaire Larry Ellison and his son David, own Paramount and are buying media institutions including CNN and TicToc. The billionaire owners of global mass media control the narrative. They buy mass media to ensure it will report what they want said. And censor what they don’t want said.
Trump’s Plan was represented by Trump’s son-in-law-law, the billionaire financier Jared Kushner, his US speculative land acquisitions once bankrolled by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and with major shares in Israel’s finance firm Phoenix known as “the JPMorgan” of Israel. Yet he is portrayed as a neutral player negotiating for human rights.
If the media and politicans can lie straight-faced and contiunously, if the big corporations are granted ever more power and control without challenge, and if the military is allowed to infiltrate public spaces to protect the rich and powerful, then we will all become Gaza – subjugated to the inhuman drive for wealth and power by the billionaire class, and terrorised if we resist.
The Palestine protests will continue. We will apply boycotts, divestments, sanctions (BDS) against Israel to end the genocide and colonisation. We will expose the lies and slights-of-hand of the media spin and political machinations on behalf of the imperialists and colonialists. Freedom for Palestine, self-determination for the people, is the test for freedom for us all.

In print:

President Trump has proclaimed Peace in the Middle East and the end of the violence against the people of Gaza! Why, then, did 600,000 people march through London last weekend calling for Freedom for Palestine? We’ve won, haven’t we?
No! This ceasefire is a respite, the third ceasefire in the two-years of the current assault upon Gaza. It does not represent peace or justice. Despite all living hostages being released, Israel has not agreed that this is a permanent ceasefire. Gaza has no electricity, neither water nor sanitation, almost no food, medical supplies or any basic infrastructure whatsoever. At least 180,000 Palestinians dead, 5 times more injured, the entire Gazan population of two-million traumatised.
The siege conditions are illegitimate, inhuman and illegal under international law. Netanyahu’s Israeli Defence Force has violated one international law after another and is not withdrawing from Gaza. The Israeli State refuses to recognise Palestine and cannot be trusted.
The first phase of the Peace Plan has no timetables and has no plan for self-determination or any representative government for the Palestinian people. Any Palestinian civil authority will be fragmented and disempowered.
A Board of Peace chaired by the President of the United States of America is yet to be organised, unlikely to include the hated Tony Blair or to replace the Israeli occupation with an international military force, the tensions high across the Region. However contrived, Gaza will remain a militarised open-air impoverished prison, the IDF securing its perimeter.
The Plan does not include any details of reparations for the wholesale destruction of Gaza by Israel, and no accountability for Netanyahu’s war crimes. There will be no dismantling of all the Israeli settlements in and around Palestine’s West Bank, gained by force and ethnic cleaning and declared illegal over decades by the United Nations Council. There’s no right-of-return for any of the 8 million Palestinian diaspora – those already forced from their own land and living in exile.
This short pause is better than nothing. A respite. But it’s not over. No people can agree and sign-up for the end of their very existence. The people are traumatised and immiserised but have not surrendered. The potential for a viable Palestinian State, as already recognised by the UK and 148 other nations, is further away than the serious opportunity for “a land for all” – a secular and multicultural democratic state from the river to the sea.
Gaza represents the most barbarous peak of the logic of the system we are all subjected to: the ideological commitment of western politicians to the racist elitist tenets of Zionism, and the capitalist economics clawing at the wealth of the region through imperialist militarism.
Today’s meeting of the most powerful politicians and Corporate directors in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, includes business talks to carve-up the beach-front property rights and the gas and oil extraction off the coast. Trump wants this deal because he wants-in on the “Gaza Riviera” property developments.
The media and politicians obscure the facts. We are all at risk of becoming Gazans – subjugated to the inhuman drive for wealth and power by the billionaire class, and terrorised if we resist. The big corporations are granted ever more power and control without challenge, and the military is allowed to infiltrate public spaces to protect the rich and powerful.
The Palestine protests will continue. We will apply boycotts, divestments, sanctions (BDS) to end the genocide and colonisation. We will expose the lies and slights-of-hand of the media spin and political machinations. Freedom for Palestine! Self-determination for the people! Gaza is the test for freedom for us all.

Cash for Nuclear War but not Welfare!

My weekly Comment column in the daily Plymouth Herald (3.6.25), responding to Starmer’s outrageous and dangerous Strategic Defence Review, representing a drive towards nuclear war. The Idiot! A colossal waste of money in pursuit of personal aggrandisement and ultra-nationalist status at the expense of all emotional security and economic progress. The scale of my anger cannot be printed. Join me on Saturday 7th to protest, shout and scream, rage at the injustice. Welfare not Warfare! Nurses not Nukes! Books not Bombs! 12 noon at the Guildhall Square, Armada Way, Plymouth.

[in the event some 100 dedicated anti-nuclear activists joined the protests despite torrential rain. It was a start, a reconvening of those most alert to the risk of nuclear proliferation and war. Thank you each and every one].

Cash found for War instead of Welfare

What will you feel, say and do on the morning you wake-up to hear that a nuclear bomb has been exploded upon a population? You see, the idea that it’s the end of everything is not quite correct. In the ensuing nuclear war, the majority of the human race will die over prolonged periods of time in pain, homelessness and famine. Nuclear war bears no comparison to conventional warfare, the radioactive fallout keeps on killing, the destruction of infrastructure total.
The UK Government’s Strategic Defence Review has committed an additional £15 billion to nuclear weapons. The British tax-payer is buying F-32A jets to carry air-launched missiles carrying nuclear warheads, and adding a new fleet of nine nuclear “attack” submarines to the four new Dreadnought super-Subs armed with first-use Trident nuclear warheads.
We are in a “pre-War situation”, exclaimed Defence Minister Healey.
Britain will build 6 new munitions factories costing an extra £6billion over the next 5 years. 7,000 long-range weapons are to be built in the UK – a massive arsenal. Clearly the next war will be a nuclear war.
UK troops are part of a wider European military strategy and the entire nuclear weapons system based here will be reliant upon the provisions and infrastructure of the United States of America.
The Trident nuclear weapons system is not independent, always having been reliant upon and governed by the USA. Now it is announced that British-based US fighter jets will carry nuclear bombs, the “air delivery system” carrying “tactical nuclear weapons”. The proposition is that nuclear weapons can be used without mutually assured destruction. It is a nonsense.
The wars in Ukraine, Sudan and Palestine have proved that the classic “Rules of Engagement”, even if they used to be adhered to, don’t apply anymore. Military leaders are clear that they will do whatever they want to civilian targets and use weapons of mass destruction despite any international laws, rules of warfare or moral considerations. Genocide is normalised. Attack-first is the order of the day on all sides.
Public attitudes are being reset. Recruitment and retention in the armed forces is crucial, especially when most young people don’t want to fight and die. The proposed volunteer “Dad’s Army” is designed to demand allegiance. A new ideological offensive of militarisation coupled with patriotism (defined more by hate-filled xenophobia than love of country) is being wheeled-out.
Tax money is plentiful for military rearmament but not hospitals and schools. We are seeing tens-of-thousands of jobs being lost in health, education and social care, far more jobs lost than will be created by the arms industry.
Governments always find tax cash for weapons but not for welfare. It would cost £1.5 bn to reverse the Winter Fuel Allowance to pay £300a year to 10million pensioners, £3.5 billion to reverse the 2-child benefit cap safeguarding a third child with £66 per week, and £5 billion to reverse the draconian cuts to benefits for people with disabilities.
That money would be available now if they scrapped the £13 billion per year being spent on Trident nuclear weapons of mass destruction.
The NATO summit next month will recommend 3.5% of GDP to be spent on military resources and another 1.5% on civil protection and security. That 5% of GDP represents even more Austerity, cuts to welfare services and social infrastructure – the opposite of a safe and secure population.
We must protest against this drive to war – a waste of money, humanity and the environment. Demand the end of nuclear weapons – Welfare not Warfare! Saturday 7th June, 12 noon at Plymouth’s Guildhall Square. Join us! CNDUK.org

Oppose the Drive to War!

PS. I laughed at the editor’s placement of a picture of Putin alongside my name. I have always lived by the adage, “Neither Washington nor Moscow but International Socialism”.

All this wondrous talk of Peace is actually the opposite – it’s War Talk! The government’s Strategic Defence Review is proof enough of that. Why would we need to declare an emergency uplift in military spending, at a direct and crippling cost to welfare benefits for people with disabilities, unless we were preparing for war?
The second question is two-fold. Who is about to attack us and who are we about to attack? Talk of Russia taking-over Europe is beyond nonsense. On the one hand the western military strategists say the Russian economy is in tatters and at the same time they argue that Putin wants to invade Britain. Both arguments cannot be correct.
The hypocrisy gets worse. Our leaders and those across the West are wringing their hands at the enforced famine and mass starvation of two million Palestinians, whilst actively providing the arms and hardware with which to pound and systematically murder people across Gaza.
The stated desire for ceasefire is not what it seems. They are reconfiguring towards fresh battle lines in Europe, the Middle East and the far-East.
Labour’s so-called ‘defence’, by which they mean the promotion of war and militarism, represents an offensive ideology competing with the right-wing of the Tories and chasing the ultra-nationalism of Reform UK. Not only a ‘triple lock’ on Trident replacement, producing a new generation of outrageously expensive but illegal weapons of mass destruction, but also prioritising rearmament tied into the US ideological and military framework.
The global tensions are being ramped-up by the West. The West is worried by the fact of a multi-polar world where newly industrialised countries are strengthening and new values are being asserted, such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, led by the states of the global South.
The West does not accept this new world and is willing to go to war to prevent it, apparently even to nuclear war.
There is no Peace in Palestine, because the UK’s F-35 exports are more important than stopping genocide. The UK placing its bombers in Diego Garcia and firing on Yemen represent preparations for war against Iran, a country whose people and economy cannot afford war.
The fragile ceasefire between India and Pakistan represents a ramping-up of more proxy hostilities, the West seeking India’s allegiance in preparation for an offensive upon China.
These battles represent new spheres of influence, changing the old certainties of Western imperialist domination. Ultimately these wars are about the assertion of power by force by competing regional elites to extract enormous personal wealth. They should be exposed and opposed.
Meanwhile the transfer of workers’ tax-money from education, health and social welfare to increase arms spending to 2.5% and then 3%+ of our Gross Domestic Product sets us on a war-footing. It provides a big boost to the British arms industry under the Big Lie of re-industrialisation.
We’re not conned by this false impression that military production can generate economic growth. The decline of manufacturing industries is separate from the arms industry, tax investment in weapons systems diverting all possible investment from the civil production and climate adaptations urgently required.
War batters the international working class, destroying our security, welfare and wellbeing. The continuation of enforced Austerity – the destruction of our social infrastructure – intensifies working class vulnerability.
The destruction of hundreds-of-thousands of jobs in education and health in order to pay for a rise of a few tens-of-thousands of jobs associated with the military should not be condoned by trade unions.
Next Saturday’s huge national demonstration will shout for Peace with Social Justice, in Palestine and everywhere. Welfare not Warfare!

Oppose Rearmament and Militarism

This week’s comment Column in the daily Plymouth Herald (6.5.25), uncharacteristically offering a personal memory in pursuit of a wider general point. Being against imperialist war is not a pacifist stance necessarily – it is a recognition of class society. Workers are sent to die for the ambitions and profits of the ruling class. And the Second World War was, above all, an imperialist war. We need to build working class resistance to oppose the drive towards the third world war, urgently.

The full text:

“Those who celebrate war have never seen it”. The words of my father, who fought through the entire 6 years of the Second World War. A skilled sailor, a gunner on the convoys, steering a landing craft on D-Day, he never spoke of his experiences until in his late seventies, and then seemed unable to stop recounting the horror.
My mother lost her first husband in ‘41. He was a bomber pilot. She, a young widow, then served as a fire warden, spotting the bombs to warn the emergency services. My parents married on VE Day +1, a date later to become their granddaughter’s birthday. The wedding was brief and a celebratory act, Dad about to finish his training at Turnchapel to captain an assault craft for the ground invasion of Japan.
Victory in Europe didn’t mean the war had finished. Their hasty marriage reflected fear as well as happiness, and the war experience infected the rest of their long but haunted lives.
There has been more war ever since, the competition between imperialist powers continuing to today, with a war in Europe and clamour for more war in the Middle East and against China.
Eighty Years on there are few who remember the impacts of war at home as well as abroad, even if the emotions are handed down the generations. I’ll never forget my old man’s eyes, glaring through his memories as he described the killing, his friends on fire as the ship began listing from the explosions, enemy planes strafing the deck, him seeing the face of his foe in the cockpit as he shot him down.
The trauma doesn’t go away when the fighting stops. War doesn’t ever stop once it’s in your head.
And yet this week, service men and women will be in school classrooms exalting military service. Infant and Primary School teachers, and even nursery staff will be encouraging the glorification of wearing uniform and dying for your country.
Teachers’ trade unions are warning against the militarisation of the curriculum. Whole classrooms will empty to learn the rudiments of marching on Plymouth Hoe, waving union jacks and singing the national anthem. Are pupils being brainwashed into this generation’s cannon fodder? Tax money for armaments has been taken from education budgets – mistaken priorities, surely?
Don’t tell me we’re not being prepared for war. Don’t pretend this week is a commemoration of a horror never to be repeated. The horror is continuing today in the Middle East, Europe and Africa and the messaging is towards the glorification of War, not a celebration of Peace.
Prime Minister Starmer, joining at Plymouth, slept a night onboard aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales a fortnight ago, addressing the deployment of young sailors from HMS Drake and elsewhere in battle fatigues reminiscent of Thatcher’s photos as a tank commander. Hurried rearmament was his message.
Starmer’s sending forces to the South China Seas via the Mediterranean, targeting Gaza, threatening Iran, bombing Yemen, and trying to deploy “troops on the ground” in war zones. Prime Ministers all want to command a war as their legacy. Remembering Blair he’d be advised to be careful what to wish for.
The week Starmer’s government announced an additional £5bn for the armed forces he also announced £5bn in cuts to disabilities allowances and PiP. War costs. He’s now spending £10bn a year on Trident nuclear weaponry that can never be used. Basic rate tax is bound to rise.
My MP, the Armed Forces Minister Luke Pollard, has developed a keenness for war preparations, raising spending to 2.5% of GDP and not stopping there, despite 1 in 4 of our children living in poverty amidst crumbling infrastructure and Austerity Mark II.
Plymouth’s former Royal Marines officer, Fred Thomas MP, might regret the rising rate of homelessness of veterans but his government is cutting public services for all. At the same time, the far-Right scream for the return of National Service if not conscription.
Raising military spending to 3% or even the 5% wished-for by President Trump is a target in the Government’s eye, a preparation for war. Deterring war requires detente and diplomacy, not militarism. Let our children study Peace.
We are being prepared. Wall-to-wall glorification of war, promotion of illegal weapons of mass-destruction both chemical and nuclear, plastic-doll cuddling of soldiers in uniform, ultra-nationalism being required as standard, the identification of all “others” as threats and potential enemies. Hatred of the “sub-humans”. Call of Duty 1-6. Militarism is a tool for authoritarian control, jingoism and subjugation.
I shall commemorate the dead and campaign for Peace in their memory. Welfare not Warfare!

Imperialist War only Helps the Rich to Get Richer

The original:

The times they are a’changing.
The accelerating shift towards the domination of far-Right political leadership is happening because the global system of Capitalism is in crisis. Regions are scrabbling for resources. Competition is acute.
At such times, as in the 1910’s and the 1930’s, the vulnerable sections of the world’s ruling class turn away from the pleasantries of democracy and towards totalitarian control. Authoritarianism is growing everywhere seeking to make popular the politics of the far-Right.
At best, and only during times of relative prosperity, parliamentary democracy offers a chimera of popular suffrage – the ‘right to vote” symbolising a symbolic engagement of every citizen with the real forces of the Boss Class that rule over our lives and futures. In truth we have little say.
The “mixed-economy” of the 1950’s and ‘60’s allowed the social infrastructure to be rebuilt from the ruins of the Second World War, State taxes claiming 95% of each £ for the highest earners, raising the cash for social (council) housing, health, education, care of children and the elderly and vulnerable, and our nationally owned utilities.
But once the certainty of a working class healthy and educated enough to meet modern employment needs was established, the Capitalists decided to reclaim their profit rates by reducing the amount of tax they pay, at least by half, and organise to get most of the rest back in State-paid allowances to their private businesses. They returned to laissez-faire neo-liberal free-market economics.
The working classes are left to pay for our own services. Today, the super-rich and billionaires pay hardly anything into the common purse whilst getting subsidised by us. They are insatiable and in no way satisfied by the enormous increase in their private wealth and power since the 1970’s.
Most of the huge transnational corporate monopolies are now simply too big to fail, receiving routine tax-bail-outs whilst increasing levels of unrepayable debt.
They are too vulnerable to global tensions to spend their hoards of money. There’s little or no investment from the billions of billions in profits into maintaining the social infrastructure that their businesses need society to provide. If the bosses had to pay for the welfare of their workforce they’d make little profit. Instead, with the global growth of the working class, they don’t need a full pool of locally educated and healthy workers when they can trawl the world for cheap and able labour.
So our Western infrastructure is crumbling, the USA and UK being some of the worst examples. The Capitalists want sure-fired short-term high-yield returns on any investments they make. Public health, public housing, public education (just about anything publicly owned) doesn’t make big profits.
Many essential services and utilities aren’t profitable except through a one-time asset-stripping robbery. Transition of energy supplies to renewables doesn’t make the scale of profits from oil.
So what does make big short term profit apart from fossil fuels (oh, and mind-numbing drugs to manage the alienation of wage-slavery)? War.
A bullet or bomb can only explode once and has to be replaced. There’s no multi-use for munitions. The price of munitions is determined by the market – the more wars, the more demand, the higher the profit. The military-industrial complex cherry-picks for high-return investment, leaving the tax-payer to pay for the true costs of militarisation. High-tech, big bangs and nuclear capabilities make the biggest killing.
As an aside, the destruction of huge areas of infrastructure, let’s say Gaza or the Donbas region of Ukraine, the higher the value of the land and real-estate for fresh private investment. The decaying old infrastructure, now collapsed, can be purloined, owned and rebuilt with high profit margins. The prime land is worth investing in again.
Little wonder there is now a drive to war. It’s not so much about freedom for the People as freedom for the corporations to rejuvenate their portfolios and profit margins. They need to free-up the congested and aging markets to kick-start a fresh round of exploitation of people and natural resources. Wars kick-start a fresh round of plunder of people and natural resources.
Even then, it is the tax-payer who is expected to make the investment in building a new military, not the billionaires. Ruling classes and their tame politicians identify enemies, whip-up nationalism, glory in militarism, start the looting of land, minerals and the cheap labour of the battered survivors.
Politicians make a song and dance about security and justice, whipping-up fear and racism in their drive for compliance, whilst mostly it’s about competition between corporate states for market domination. That’s the definition of imperialism.
War is built-in to the Capitalist System. And always it’s the working class who are conscripted, either through financial imperative or legal requirement, to fight and be shot or die, whilst the profiteers rake-in the cash from wholesale destruction. We pay the price.
Be cautious of any enthusiasm for rearmament. In the immediate, the billions spent on war come at the price of cuts to the essential services we all need. Wars destroy our social infrastructure. Wars come at terrible cost to the survivors, our quality of life shattered, our memories polluted with images of horror, our relationships distorted, all supposedly in the name of our national interest.
The workers of the world never benefit from war. We must invest in Peace. Welfare not Warfare!

We in the UK have to take Trump Seriously

My Weekly Comment column in the daily Plymouth Herald (28.2.25), delayed from its usual Tuesday slot for “technical reasons”, allowing for a Comment Column from the editor supporting more war with Russia, and then a military person writing on the need for emergency weapons production. Last week’s column was stopped by the editor, my call for peace being identified as similar to “seeking to appease Hitler” (ie Putin).
Last week I warned of Europe promoting world war three against Russia. Today my weaker and compromised column warns only of Trump, not NATO and Starmer. Bizarrely, by the evening of the 28th, Trump had been broadcast across the world bullying and condemning Zelenskyy to his face in the Oval Office.
So when Trump spoke again of World War Three I kinda feel vindicated, while wishing I’d argued harder and stuck to my guns. I should have learnt by now – don’t compromise!

This week’s column:

We have to take Trump seriously. However you wish to caricature, disparage or mock him, Trump is at the head of a very powerful cabal, an administration that has well-formed and long-prepared plans from a coherent ideological framework.
The Trump administration has at its heart, far-right nationalism, separate from the Project for New American Century of the 1990’s. It is not a set of policies opposed to war, reference Iraq and Afghanistan, but rather focussed upon the benefit of any war to the United States plc.
Any presentation of Trump as a peacemaker must be considered in this regard – what benefits do his group within the American ruling class secure through any conflict or peace deal? This is not particularly a question of likes and dislikes, just what’s in it for the US corporations. Trumpism offers nothing to the working classes of the USA or anywhere else.
At this juncture, the acknowledgement of the third year of war in Ukraine, the Trumpian propaganda surrounding a peace deal can be falsely considered as an alliance with Putin or abandonment of Ukraine. Rather it is a negotiating platform. The USA has given more than $100billion to Ukraine to fund the war, plus Musk’s Starlink satellite communication systems and much else of the essential military infrastructure, and Trump wants to see a return on the investment.
Trump has said he wants the mineral wealth of Ukraine in return for continued provision of arms. This is not to be condoned, but is not the same as abandonment. It is possible to imagine deals that ensure new military investment. It is also possible to imagine European countries stepping-up to take-over from the USA, from much of the same motive were they able to afford it. The current economic stagnation makes rearmament a very long-term project.
Trump says his country is shielded by a beautiful ocean, the Atlantic, making Russia, a much smaller economy than the USA, of little or no threat to him. By contrast, America’s corporate core recognises China as a very present threat, economically and culturally across the world, and potentially militarily across the Pacific.
Making America Great Again means pushing back against China and its BRICS alliance. Europe will have to deal with Russia.
So where does Britain stand? It is not difficult to perceive of the UK as tThe USA’s 51st State. We are heavily dominated by US culture and military alliance despite having far fewer economic ties than would at first appear.
Prime Minister Starmer’s audience with the President this week should expose his country’s political dependence on the USA, Trump’s nationalism notwithstanding. And for this, Starmer will step-up as America’s watchdog in Europe, bragging to replace the armaments of the US with those of the UK and challenging Europe to do the same.
Starmer has already pledged an increase in UK military spending from 2.3 to 2.5% of GDP, the highest in Europe, representing an extra £3bn in the past year. The coming Strategic Defence Review will map increased investment in weaponry and soldiers towards the pie-in-the-sky “ideal” of 3% of GDP, despite high borrowing and crumbling social infrastructure.
Doing Trump’s bidding will come at a huge cost to our health service, housing stock, welfare benefits, transport systems and green energy transition. The expansion of the UK’s military-industrial complex, much already ownedd by US corporations, will not reflate our economy as a whole, just one section that is already enjoying record profits from tax-moneys.
The USA pulling-back from Ukraine will have heavy political and economic consequences for European countries, a situation to the benefit of the USA that has long wanted to curb the economic power of the continent. And politically, the accelerated rise of the far-Right here, feeding off the rise in poverty and insecurity, will encourage support for the Trumpian rhetoric, itself so two-faced in its true intention.
Some praise Trump for his transactional approach to power in a Capitalist world. His is an example of how Capitalism actually functions – as a constant competition between combatants, seeking to make offers that cannot be refused or actual hostile takeovers. Gangsters and the organised criminal gangs learnt all they know from the legitimate corporate players.
The challenge is this. If you oppose Trump you have to firstly oppose those with power in the UK who support him, and those he supports. The Trump administration is dominating a period going forward in which they can wield enormous power and impact across the world. They must be stopped.

Workers don’t Win in Imperialist Wars

Perhaps Ukraine will shortly see an enforced peace after an enforced war. That will be a decision made in agreement between Washington and Moscow, not in Ukraine. The country’s past three years have been a horror of human butchery, deprivation, forced migration and environmental destruction. A war that had brewed for decades because of global imperialist ambitions for expansion and control of natural resources and human populations.
Imperialism is the international capitalist system. Today, in the face of global crisis, imperialist competition is increasing.
By 2014 the stage was set in Ukraine’s region of the Donbas, an ethnically and linguistically disputed region where those allied with Russia fought for separation for Ukraine. The West, dominated by the United States economically, politically and militarily through the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), had been siting military bases around the Russian border in neighbouring states, and Russia as a State with its own imperialist regional ambitions pushed back.
The tensions deepened, open conflicts erupted, and the forces from both sides intensified until Russia invaded on 24th February 2022.
The Ukrainian people were forced to war by much wider imperialist ambitions, as stand-ins for the NATO troops themselves. As always, Ukrainians wanted peace and stability but were divided by the very different cultural identities between the north of the country and the south east, as well as an organised far-right nationalist political grouping seeking Parliamentary domination, and a neoliberal economic drive to derive the benefits of integration with Europe and entrance to NATO – never going to happen.
The globally dominant empire of the United States of America has funded Ukraine’s military against Russia, making this a proxy war between two major powers.
Ukraine has been used for the battleground. America has put over £100billion into the Ukraine war, Europe £40billion, Britain £13 billion since February 2022. 16,000 Ukrainian civilians have been killed, at least 150,000 soldiers killed in action.
Trump is refusing to pay anymore because America’s global interests lie elsewhere.
The war has raised the spectre of nuclear conflict once again, and raised State spending on the military-industrial complex across the West at the direct expense of money for health & welfare at home.
Amongst them, Prime Minister Starmer is the greatest hawk, giving another £150million only last week and boasting to increase the UK’s proportion of tax money spent on weapons, including nuclear warheads, to the highest of any country in Europe. He’s arguing for the war to continue as a rational to keep increasing the UK military tax investment towards 5% of GDP despite all economic warnings. He’s wasting our money for the sake of political posturing.
America is looking away from Europe in a strategic assessment of the growth of regional rivals such as China. Trump is no Peacemaker other than at the point of a missile, and he wants to focus upon US military operations in the Pacific. He expects Europe to resolve its own tensions, and Starmer is obeying by making the UK America’s military HQ in Europe, ready to put our troops into Ukraine. That will cost us, the UK population, dear in terms of deeper austerity and militarism. It’s not in our interests.
The lesson of Ukraine is that, even in Europe in the 21st Century, there can be devastating war, death and destruction. There is a drive to more war, funded by the arms manufacturers and the cyber-industries supported by their ultra-nationalist politicians. We’d better sue for Peace while there’s a chance. That means active opposition to imperialism whether in Ukraine or Palestine or the South China Seas. Stop the Wars, Now!

End

No picture

unedited version:

Perhaps Ukraine will see an enforced peace after an enforced war. That will be a decision made in agreement between Washington and Moscow. The past three years have been a horror of human butchery, deprivation, forced migration and environmental destruction. A war that had brewed for decades, partly from the disputed borders left unresolved at the end of the Second World War and later the collapse of the Soviet Union, but mostly because of global imperialist ambitions for expansion and control of natural resources and human populations. 

Nation states and borders are determined through conflict and redrawn out of negotiated settlements. All borders are artificial and impermanent. Rivers can be crossed, mountains spanned, the lines on maps fought over, human beings dying in their millions for a few miles of devastated environment to be transferred from one regional ruling class to another.

Imperialism is the international capitalist system. The system of capitalism at a local level sees producers and merchants compete to make money, at an international level States and allied Regions compete for market dominance on behalf of their Capitalist corporations. Today, in the face of global crisis, imperialist competition is increasing. 

There is cultural imperialism and the fight for dominant ideology, economic imperialism using loans and corporate domination of other nations, and where these aren’t sufficient there is military imperialism: colonialism, subjugation and outright war. Now there is growing competition among the big imperialist powers and regional or “sub” imperialist ones.

By 2014 the stage was set in Ukraine’s region of the Donbas, an ethnically and linguistically disputed region  where those allied with Russia fought for separation for Ukraine. The West, dominated by the United States economically, politically and militarily through the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), had been siting military bases around the Russian border in neighbouring states and in Ukraine, and Russia as a State with its own imperialist regional ambitions pushed back. 

The tensions deepened, open conflicts erupted, and the forces from both sides intensified until Russia invaded on 24th February 2022. 

The Ukrainian people were forced to war by much wider imperialist ambitions, as stand-ins for the NATO troops themselves. As always, Ukrainians wanted peace and stability but were divided by the very different cultural identities between the north of the country and the south east, as well as an organised far-right nationalist political grouping seeking Parliamentary domination, and a neoliberal economic drive to derive the benefits of integration with Europe and entrance to NATO – never going to happen.

In any class society there is never national unity. The ruling class sends the working class to fight. There are those who benefit and profit from war, and the many more who suffer greatly.

The globally dominant empire of the United States of America has funded Ukraine’s military against Russia, making this a proxy war between the major powers. 

Ukraine has been used for the battleground. America has put over £100billion into the Ukraine war, Europe £40billion, Britain £13 billion since February 2022. 16,000 Ukrainian civilians have been killed, at least 150,000 soldiers killed in action. Trump is refusing to pay anymore, not as a peacemaker but because America’s global interested lie elsewhere. 

The war has raised the spectre of nuclear conflict once again, and raised State spending on the military-industrial complex across the West at the direct expense of money for health & welfare at home. Amongst them, Prime Minister Starmer is the greatest hawk, giving another £150million last week and boasting to increase the UK’s proportion of tax money spent on weapons, including nuclear warheads, to the highest of any country in Europe. He’s arguing against all things rational  to keep increasing the UK tax investment towards 5% of GDP regardless of all strategic analysis to the contrary. He’s wasting our money for the sake of political posturing.

America is looking away from Europe in a strategic assessment of the growth of regional rivals such as China. Trump is no Peacemaker other than at the point of a missile, and he wants to focus upon US military operations in the Pacific. He expects Europe to resolve its own tensions, and Starmer is obeying by making the UK America’s military HQ in Europe, responsible for NATO planning. That will cost us, the UK population, dear in terms of deeper austerity and militarism. It’s not in our interests.

The lesson of Ukraine is that, even in Europe in the 21st Century, there can be devastating war, death and destruction. There is a drive to more war, funded by the arms manufacturers and the cyber-industries supported by their ultra-nationalist politicians. We’d better sue for Peace while there’s a chance. That means active opposition to imperialism whether in Ukraine or Palestine or the South China Seas. Stop the Wars, Now!

Religion is Political

We are constantly warned of extremism. Not only the terrorism of car-driving, gun-toting or axe-wielding fanatics but the social orators of various fundamentalisms, political as well as religious.

We are taught to see those who haven’t been raised to our orthodoxies as potential threats.

We are told to be cautious of those who wear the symbols and emblems of a religious group or engage in mass rituals. A society with a regime that requires specific behaviours of all citizens, stopping all they would normally do in order to respect a specific religious date, is to be frowned upon as an example of anything from forced indoctrination through to mass hysteria. Oops, there goes Christmas!

All religion stems from the primordial human need to understand why we are here as well as why we die. The apparent impossibility of answering those questions opens the door to an all-but infinite number of explanations. Events and situations that are unconscionable are explained by the wisdom of god or gods who do know that which we cannot know.

Religion offers hope amidst the pains of living, and a heart in a heartless world. Faith allows acceptance of fallibility, the inhuman actions of human beings, the unreasoned and unreasonable.

Because Faith seeks to define acceptable behaviour, it is deeply political. Politics is, after all, about how people live together and behave towards each other. And so, as religions develop and grow they become organised and led, by leaders, enrobed and ordained with the word of god, to tell people how to behave.

The histories written into religious scripts convey the lessons of humanity over time, but are nevertheless written down by human beings. Ancient scriptures are reinterpreted time and again, and subjected to the censorship or acceptance of those with the power to have them published or burnt. The stories and the rules are changed over time. Crude tenets are nuanced into everyday rules of social relations. The scribes and their editors possess immense personal power. And all personal power corrupts.

There are some material reasons for religious rules. In a world without fridges it was a good rule of thumb to not eat red meat riddled with disease. Should you be starving you may still be tempted to eat a pig or a cow, even if the King threatened you with punishment. But if it is god’s word, punishable with an after-life of eternal pain and damnation, you may rather starve to death in pursuit of life in the hereafter.

The rules laid down by god are not to be broken so lightly as the laws decreed by men. And so the church has power, political power. Most organised religion tells us we are born into a place in the social structure as ordained by god, and we should accept rather than challenge our rank in the class system. But the decrees laid down by the church change over time, determined by the prevailing social conditions. The religious edicts of a feudal society have to be turned-over as a new ruling class develops – the Capitalist mercantilists taking over political power from the landlords.

The ruling class power, its wealth and standing army, determines the rules of the church, not the other way round. Monasteries are burnt to the ground, bloody wars are waged between rival sects.

Catholic versus Protestant, Sunnis versus Shia, Hindu versus Buddhist…and within each there are challengers from the Left and the Right, doubters and zealots.

All religions involve battles for power. The power of ideas, accepted or rejected by those with the wealth and armies to enforce them. To a point where all ruling ideas are the chosen ideas of the ruling class.

It’s all about power and control on Earth, not Heaven.

People learn how to think within the confines of the society and natural world we are born into. The teaching we experience in school reflects the ruling ideology, the curriculum determined by the ruling class, the behaviours enshrined in the prevailing religious order. We try to behave and accept even when those ideas make little or no sense – do we starve or break the laws in order to survive?

It is the contradictions between what we’re told to believe and what we actually experience as the world around us that foment revolutions.

Those of us who dare to challenge the ruling class also challenge the ruling ideas, and are heavily damned should that include defying the ruling religious norms. We can be proclaimed as “ungodly”, a charge far worse than being “illegal”. Yet all beliefs change with the times.

And so there are times when the enforced religious rules no longer make sense and place the people in grave danger. They have to be defied, as does the ruling class who proclaims them. With an elite of billionaires ruling over mass poverty and requiring authoritarian compliance to the money-god, we are living in such times.

In this era of escalating warfare and climate catastrophe our priority must be to organise for human welfare not religious or political dogma. That means opposing both imperialist and religious wars threatening nuclear annihilation. It also requires we challenge the consumerism producing the climate-heating toxic emissions and throwaway plastics that are killing the Planet. These are not matters of belief but observable facts.

Christmas needs a rethink.

May be an image of text

Collective Freedoms Must be Fought For

Collective Freedoms Must be Fought For

It is good to see so many are thinking about human rights, political agency and personal integrity. There is much debate about the future of democracy. The driving force for this anxiety is the accelerating instability at home and across the world.

The fall of the dictatorship of Assad in Syria has encouraged talk of universal rights, women’s suffrage and protections of minorities. With at least nine military forces vying for power in Syria, including the country’s working class who started the revolution in 2011, collective freedoms are going to have to be fought for.

Amnesty International’s decision, however late, that Israel’s destruction of Gaza represents genocide is another demand for protection of human rights. The bombing of schools and hospitals and entire civilian populations is against international law and has to be challenged for any of us to feel safe. Mass extermination is beyond all concepts of political balance and social justice.

The same bombing of Ukrainian towns by Russia is damned across our news media, but the hypocrisy of condemning Putin and not Netanyahu completely outrageous. If some groups of people are expendable then we are all at risk.

When the Prime Minister of South Korea declared martial law last week, placing the entire country under curfew policed by armed soldiers, workers amassed on the streets to reinstate democracy.

When the President of France imposed a Prime Minister from a minority party, ignoring the majority vote of the people, mass protest and industrial strikes defied the imposition and kicked out the usurper.

There is a class war for workers rights and agency happening parallel to the wars between nations. Economically, global Capitalism is in crisis, the poor immersed in debt.

In this accelerating war of competition for resources, there are battles between ideologies as well as armies.

We now see a fast-growing and organised global far-Right movement, winning elections across the globe from Argentina to Poland. The threat in the UK is real, the ultra-nationalists organised politically with promises of millions in funding from American billionaire Elon Musk. This year we have seen white power pogroms in which acts of attempted murder were committed against refugees, racist riots in town centres, meetings attacked and mosques firebombed.

Our government is pandering to the far-Right, Labour courting Reform UK, toughening Tory laws against protest and manipulating the Courts into the levels of sentencing they condemn when seen in Russia or China. Authoritarianism at home is another manifestation of deepening war abroad.

Behind all are the same forces operating on many fronts. Billionaires are funding propaganda aimed at scapegoating migrants and minorities, weaponising racism in order to hide their hideous wealth derived from our exploitation and oppression.

The level of disinformation paid for by wealthy elites mirrors their new investment in arms manufacturing and artificial intelligence, all aimed at distracting and confusing us into acquiescence. Wars make money for the few.

The Trade Unions have a key role in challenging the drive towards fascism and war. We need a strong anti-racist movement to defend the rights of minorities in order to advance the rights of the entire working class. And that means offering refuge to those scorched by war or climate change, alongside challenging the profiteers making billions from death and environmental destruction.

Bringing the human race together is the historic role of ordinary people, we, the majority working class. Our history proves that nothing is given to us without collective demands and organised challenge to those in power. Blame the billionaires not the refugees. We who want peace with social justice are going to have to fight for it.

May be an illustration of 1 person, blueprint and text

Step Back from the Brink – Join CND!

Step Back from the Brink

We’re not wrong. The sense of living on the brink of historic change is shared by most. Not only can the current status quo not be sustained, it mustn’t be. Tension mounts as a consequence.

There is no debate that climate change is happening, only what should be done about it. There is no debate that our social infrastructure is dilapidated, at least for the majority of the working class, but no consensus about rebuilding it.

There is general agreement that war is spreading – and a new kind of war at that – the mass killing of civilians by huge armaments often launched by computers and targeted by drones. This is neither fantasy nor science fiction. It is the living reality threatening to engulf us all.

The nihilists muse to themselves that global conflagration is inevitable and call out to “bring it on”, as if all life, not just theirs, is worthless. The pragmatists meanwhile, sensitive to their own plight, make preparations as best they can, hoarding durable essentials before the power cuts and alarm calls. We, those seeking peace with social justice, are greeted with distain or completely overlooked when marching in our hundreds of thousands.

What do we want? Immediate de-escalation!

The escalation in Ukraine is very serious. The Biden/Starmer agreement to use missiles into Russia has escalated the tension, Russia ratifying a change in policy, deciding to use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state if that state is backed by a nuclear force (ie NATO) should it feel directly threatened.

Reports show Ukraine has lost 40% of the territorial gains it made in the Kursk region through the Summer. The Group of Five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, each nuclear armed – China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States – recommitted to arming Ukraine and, last Tuesday, NATO concurred.

Britain’s defence secretary said last week that “if Britain’s military were asked to fight it would fight”. Britain is in no way ready for war, nor should we be. A majority of the Ukrainian population want an end to the war through peace talks, as do very large majorities of populations across Europe. The escalation is being determined by politicians in their own interests. Is Biden just looking to stop Ukrainian defeat whilst he is in office, and to what lengths will he take this?

Trump’s election is having a big impact already, with ultra-hawks in his cabinet implying that military conflict is more likely, withdrawing from nuclear agreements and focussing on Iran and China. They promise more sanctions around Iran and more economic challenges to China. Most of the real trade wars throughout history have resulted in military warfare.

Far from being a peacemaker, Trump is ready to magnify tensions in the Asian Pacific, with Starmer adding tax cash to the AUKUS nuclear pact funding nuclear capabilities in Australia, ready for war.

The ruling class of the United States of America maintain full support for Israel’s regional ambitions, the devastation of Palestine continuing, Biden continuing to arm, Trump ready to escalate the tension with Iran. The ceasefire in Lebanon is only temporary. The wars in Syria and Sudan funded as proxies for outside military powers.

Trump has favoured restarting of nuclear testing having not ratified the nuclear test treaty when last in office. The USA is looking to undertake underground nuclear testing of a new technological generation of advanced nuclear weapons, destroying any taboo against the use of nuclear weapons.

Both the USA and Russia have tested and deployed hyper-sonic rockets that can carry nuclear warheads that rise and fall too fast to be stopped. Russia used one last week, albeit without any explosives, just to show its power. These are all “first-strike” weapons, their strategic use only valuable in hitting before being hit. They are a threat, not a deterrent, demanding escalation on all sides.

Trump is not going to pull out of NATO in Europe but wants Europe to take a far greater degree of the burden of the costs and, no doubt, the impacts.

So the UK’s military spending reaches a record high outside of wartime and is planned to increase further. America’s B52 bombers are here, and their nuclear weapons will be coming to Lakenheath, Suffolk, not least because Turkey has become an unreliable ally having bought fighters from Russia. Starmer has made commitment to NATO and nuclear as a key commitment with £3bn increase in defence spending, the current £6b per year cost of the Trident nuclear weapons upgrade being a sinkhole in Britain’s military funding. No-one dare challenge the tax bill for Nuclear, however outrageous.

The proposed United Nations international study into the global impact of any nuclear exchange has now been agreed between most countries, and only voted against by the UK, Germany and Russia, saying they already know what the effects of a nuclear war would be – the countries to the fore of preparations for wider war.

The study is important. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) has commissioned enough studies to know that any nuclear exchange will kill millions and lethally contaminate entire regions with radioactivity. But the hidden fact is that millions more will survive for lengthy periods, in agony as burn casualties and sickened by cancers, struggling to find any nutritious food or potable water. Radioactive contamination is not a quick death.

The slow deaths of starvation and disease will be more common than the sudden flash of vaporisation of those caught beneath the bombs. The impact on all life, the ecology and climate, will only expedite the course of climate chaos we are already experiencing.

Another well-evidenced conclusion is that the mechanics of nuclear weaponry provides for their likely launch by accident rather than intention, especially in this era of “Artificial Intelligence” programming machines for an instant and automatic response.

Starmer’s shift to closer relationship with the nuclear-enthusiast Trump will increase his unpopularity at home. Most don’t want war, death and destruction. It is neither Namby-Pamby nor “woke” to call for Peace. Protests against war represent our collective self-interest for survival.

The safer countries in the world are those without nuclear weapons – the vast majority. Britain’s Trident Nuclear arsenal makes us the prime target.

On Saturday we will rally for a day of action for de-escalation, permanent ceasefire and Peace. Most of all, for the decommissioning of all nuclear weapons, unilaterally and internationally, before it’s too late.

We must step back from the nuclear brink.

May be an image of text

Surplus Humans are Not the Real Problem

We must not stop talking about it. Day after day we see horror on our screens. Everything from the apparent attempted assassination of a past-President to the blanket bombing of refugee camps.

We watch dramatic, high definition, cinematically enhanced moving pictures of bombs exploding into mushroom clouds and sound waves, collapsing buildings. 

There are close-ups of human carcasses with dissembled body parts, their relatives’ faces offered in close-up, blooded and wide-eyed, some screaming and others offering traumatised stares. The images can be paused, rewound, captured, recreated, saved and shared. Like a Hollywood movie.

In essence, we are being daily desensitised to the suffering of humanity.

Last week’s NATO conference in Washington heard world leaders ramping-up military plans for more war, more expenditure on war, and thereby, more images of death and destruction on TV. More frightening still was the latest language, intimated on stage and spoken more precisely on the fringes. The concept and identification of “surplus humans”. The term itself has been spoken in the Israeli Cabinet recently by a self-proclaimed fascist and racist war minister, referring directly to Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

Let’s think on that. Surplus humans. Surplus to what, to whom and by what criteria? When politicians demand to “send them back”, the presumption is they’re surplus to requirements. When walls are built to keep “them” out, permissions given to shoot to kill, they’re “surplus”. Militarised camps are built to warehouse and store hundreds of thousands at a time, of these surplus peoples. 

A couple of hundred years ago, in 1798, Thomas Malthus published a book still referenced by the more bigoted of politicians, and poorly paraphrased to suggest “overpopulation creates poverty and misery”. Malthusianism is back in fashion. Let the forces of war and climate reduce populations “naturally”, to give the smaller human race space to live. Malthus’s arguments were thoroughly disproved on the basis that as more people exist, so more resources can be produced to alleviate poverty. Today, it is largely only the elitists who still adhere to his tracts, although, in the face of climate collapse, a range of liberal minds are now starting to repeat his nonsense, amongst them the near-god of the environment, David Attenborough. 

To disprove this nonsense, is to recognise that humans have modified less than 15% of the global land surface, and settled to create homes on 10%. In the UK, 9% of the land is built-upon. There is space.   

A better example still: there more food produced in the world today than there are mouths to feed. The much-overstated argument that the current human population would require 2.5 Earth’s worth of resources in order for everyone to live to the standards of USA and Europe is full of holes – firstly, Capitalism’s overproduction of Stuff, including industrial food, is not a desirable nor sustainable way forward for humanity, and secondly Capitalisms exploitation and destruction of natural resources is not a stated goal of the vast majority of humanity. 

The issue, is resource (wealth) distribution. One-third of all food produced in the world is wasted. The reason is intentional – if the transport of the food to the people who need it is not profitable (often termed “economically viable”), and if the hungry people cannot pay the market price (including the surplus value known as profit), then they must exist in a condition of malnutrition and slowly starve – in their millions.

With a complete negation of any reason or rationality it is argued that the surplus food is a natural part of the System, it is the surplus mouths that are the problem. Capitalist society values only those who work to produce surplus for those who accumulate and hoard wealth. Those who do not or cannot are deemed a drain on society, an impediment to growth, surplus to requirements. 

Obviously it is not people who are the problem. After all, we’re all people. As a matter of fact, the System that commodifies and puts a price on every aspect of life is the problem. 

Were we to live in a system based upon human need not profit, resources could be prioritised to ensure every human has the basics of life ensured: nutrition, shelter, health care, education and community – love. And there is more than enough to go round.

Instead, adherents of the system of Capitalism are knowingly destroying the planet, descending into war, genocide and barbarism. And these acts don’t go away simply by turning off our TV. They continue to come towards us and engulf us. 

We are witnessing the rapidly developing situation towards one billion climate refugees by 2035, forced to leave their homelands due to extremes of weather impossible to live under. Crop failures, permanent drought, or fires or floods that destroy arable land create both war for the diminishing resources and mass migration for survival. 

These conditions, now recognised by the warrior class of NATO and every imperial power, are likely to be answered by rapid the development of more vast refugees camps, the people guarded and impoverished, incarcerating the millions forced to stay and die where they were born, surplus to requirements of the global system of Capitalism whilst the world leaders spend more than $2trillion each year on armaments.

To believe there are surplus humans is to have lost all humanity. If a society says some lives don’t matter, then one day that life is likely to be yours. Not watching the latest news will only bring this ever closer to our doors. The real news is that we’d best change the System, fast.

Third World War is a Real threat

The unedited version below:

Historians can describe the signs of coming war: crisis of economy, class tensions at home, scarcity of resources, competition for land and food, pestilence and poverty forcing mass migration.

But war does not begin before they’ve built their armies. War needs advanced planning, not just of the military hardware but of the emotional commitment of the populations involved.

Politicians need to begin making carefully contrived propaganda speeches years in advance. Allying the individual citizen with national interests is a starting point.

Identifying and detailing the alien nature of ‘The Enemy” and broadcasting their atrocities is an essential prerequisite to the conscription of the population ready to fight and kill the subhuman hoards threatening all borders.

The guns and tanks, fighters and mass uniforms must be produced well in advance. New factories have to be built, paid for by a raise in the tax percentage of the Gross Domestic Profit siphoned-off for weapons in spite of any other social concerns and needs of the day.

A sense of national pride must be reestablished, especially if the nation has, to date, been internationalist and multicultural. This can take years and years. Friends who enjoy a variety of cultural lifestyles or faiths have to be set against each other. A new hierarchy of acceptable and unacceptable behaviours and beliefs must be enforced, mirroring the nations’ elite.

This takes a concerted effort that crosses all other political drives within the ruling class. There has to be governance that espouses national unity to the masses – the working class. Corporations that are in constant competition can unite in favour of the flag, even while seeking fresh profits inside a war economy.

Politicians begin public statements early on. Some of their kites fly immediately, others need to be thrown-up over and over again on the run. A likely lad, easily disposed of if scorned and derided by public opposition, has to be chosen to say, for example, “we are moving from a post-war to a pre-war world”, and “Britain needs to be prepared for war”. Now.

It’s important that the Leader of the Opposition agrees, amplifying the call that the tax-payer must “raise the UK’s defence spending to 2.5% of GDP as soon as resources allow”.

Better still, outdo the policies of the current Party of government. Emphasise the barbarity of the Enemy. Expel the anti-imperialists. Promise to extend and accelerate current development of weapons of mass destruction. Ultimate support for, say nuclear weapons, should trump all other pledges.

All tensions between employees and employers, profiteers and wage-slaves, must be eliminated, class consciousness replaced with nationalist fervour.

Most vitally, the spokespeople for the working class – the people who will be transferred into military uniforms to die for King and Country or be moved to essential military production – must be forcefully cajoled into accepting the changes and bundled into common effort for the coming conflagration.

Trade union leaders have that role to play, primarily to oppose and isolate all anti-warfare activists inside their ranks. In park until they must witchhunt “groups that look to build networks inside trade unions to undermine the defence industry. Jobs for death must replace jobs for life.

An enormous degree of top-down propaganda promoting the need for war is needed because working class people know war is no good.

There has to be a period of one-off clashes, escalating violence and heightened tension between the opposing sides in order to prove that war is essential. Alliances need to be formed and tested between nations before the global war begins.

An enormous amount of top-down propaganda promoting the need for war is required because working class people know that war is no good. The doubters have to be identified as “The Enemy Within”.

War doesn’t make life better for us. Mostly, we die. A military economy is one of shortages and rationing, the absence of welfare, long queues for medical aid or charitable distribution of food aid.

War does make big money for the arms manufacturers and their big shareholders. On all sides. It produces long-term suffering for the rest.

It is time, in fact past time, for a fresh movement against war. The signs are with us, echoing the pre-war years of 1912-14 or 1937-39. The Third World War will dwarf the 70 million deaths of the last world war. All the efforts of those who care for the future of humanity have to combine to prevent the current drive to world war.

May be an image of map and text

Beware, Fascism is on the Rise.

Beware, Fascism is on the Rise.

For those of us concerned for the advancement of human rights and social justice, last week’s chaos in the Commons offered many warnings.

Parliament was supposed to debate a motion about the destruction of Gaza and deaths of at least 30,000 civilians, including no fewer than 12,000 children under the age of 14, all trapped without means of escape.

By the weekend we could all be excused for believing that the debate had actually been about the mortal threat to MPs at the hands of extremists and terrorists inside the UK. The original motion, tabled by the Scottish nationalists, deploring the very apparent “collective punishment” of Palestinians at the hands of the Israeli State and calling for an immediate Ceasefire had been cancelled-out by self-interested politicking.

The shenanigans in the House of Commons saw both Tory and Scottish MPs walk out in disgust, leaving a Labour amendment to be voted for, unanimously by the Labour benches, declaring there should be a humanitarian ceasefire (without explanation of what that may look like), no military assault on Rafah, release of all hostages and immediate humanitarian relief.

There’s no sign of that happening amidst growing reports of hundreds of thousands now suffering malnutrition in a collective condition of enforced starvation. Instead, the UK’s Prime Minister accused the Speaker of the House of Commons to have “sided with terrorists”. 

The Tory Party had stood with Israel’s right to self-defence in opposition to the Scottish motion. The Labour Party had carefully manipulated the proposed debate to prevent the UK agreeing to an immediate Ceasefire, effectively condoning the continuation of the killing of civilians. 

It was later revealed that Keir Starmer spoke to the President of Israel, Isaac Herzog, before drawing-up Labour’s amendment, whilst the Speaker of the House, Lyndsey Hoyle recently visited Israel and that his father, Doug Hoyle, helped found Labour Friends of Israel. The complicity is obvious to all. Hoyle helped Starmer to block a vote on the humanitarian SNP motion, depriving the public of any voice.

Criticism of the policies and actions of the Israeli State is not a criticism or attack on Jews. Support for Palestinian rights – equal to the human rights of everyone else – is not anti-semitic. The level of active protests across Britain, numbering into millions of people on our streets since the 7th October proves beyond doubt that the majority opinion in Britain is of horror and outrage at the level of death and destruction in Gaza. Once again, Parliament has not represented The People, not just in Scotland but across the entirety of Britain, including England.

It is astounding, even in comparison with all the morally bankrupt political games of the past few years, that a debate on human rights – civilians should not be intentionally bombed in their thousands under any circumstances – has been used to introduce yet more laws against our freedoms and suffrage. 

This is political gaslighting: the psychological manipulation of the electorate, repeatedly challenging our understanding and perception of reality, seeking to confuse and create uncertainty, creating a passivity, giving-in to the perpetrators of the abuse.

Gaslighting can be a very effective tool for the abuser to control an individual. It’s done slowly so the victim writes-off the event as a one-off or oddity and doesn’t realize they are being controlled and manipulated.

Just as politicians impose ever-greater authority over us, they claim they are the victims. New laws are proposed for lawful assembly and protest to be further curtailed this week specially to protect MPs from us, adding to the most extreme laws against strike action and protest already enacted in the last year. Those supporting war abroad are also using it to force tighter social controls at home.

This is important. Democracy here is in chaos and being undermined daily. Authoritarianism is being advanced and ramped-up through a mix of gaslighting, warmongering and racism. Ministerial statements minimising the impact of war whilst dehumanising entire populations are used to promote the UK production and sale of ever-more deadly arms to dictatorships, warlords and gangsters on all sides.

The ramping-up of Islamaphobia by back-benchers such as Lee Anderson, Liz Truss and Suella Braverman calling for “direct action” against refugees, minorities and the Left – that is, those of us protesting for human rights – and praising the likes of Tommy Robinson, sees them empowering the home-grown fascist thugs to go on the attack, not only with their vile on-line threats and abuse but with violence on the streets. They are building a new Party of the Far-Right, of which Reform UK is seeking to become the mass vehicle. 

For the record, the majority of those here protesting for a ceasefire in Gaza are White working class anti-racists, not least because we know that racism divides and weakens us.  Our  protests for Freedom for Palestine need to be ramped-up. Those moved into action by the horror must recognise that this is not only a call for a ceasefire and international social justice but also human rights at home. 

In these volatile times it is not difficult to imagine Britain falling into a totalitarian state. All that is needed is for working class people to be convinced of imminent risk and attack from a “foreign force” alongside personal risk from the “enemy within”. This falsehood, this “Great Lie”, is being enacted. Now.