My weekly comment column in the daily Plymouth Herald (1.7.25) opposing the Welfare Bill currently in debate. It’s mean, it’s punitive to those most in need – especially the young – and it’s a policy of capitalist privilege and entitlement benefiting the wealthiest in society. Fight it. Fight Austerity. Tax the Rich…in fact, ban them!

U-turns are sometimes used to ensure you carry on in the direction you intended. They don’t always represent back-tracking or a change of mind.
Changing the criteria for claims for Personal Independence Allowance (PIP) and Health element of Universal Credit appears at first glance to restore welfare rights. Many politicians who were prepared to rebel against their Party Leadership and the anger of their parliamentary Whips now claim victory, whilst those MPs who stood by Starmer, including Plymouth’s two Labour MP’s, are now shamed by their obvious lack of concern for people with disabilities.
In reality, the changes are superficial. Under the guise of getting people back to work, should someone with disabilities actually find an employer willing to hire them – a rare event in itself – the claimant risks everything. If the job doesn’t work out you become a “new claimant”, and hey presto, where a month ago you would receive assistance with the essential tasks that you find impossible, the new eligibility criteria says you’re not worthy. You are condemned to severe poverty.
People with disabilities confined to limited lives with close horizons feel unfulfilled, the problem being all the barriers to being able to work: the employers who won’t make flexible adjustments to meet their needs; the poor transport facilities and costs; the cost of specialist apparatus. These are social barriers that effectively create or exacerbate the physical or mental characteristics of a person’s individual abilities.
Generally, it is society that determines disability by facilitating every person, or not. Legal changes to require employers to provide facilities would develop social inclusion, not the sharp stick of requiring crude employment that risks individual failure.
The current benefit system does write people off, it’s true. But changing the arithmetic of benefit costs is an inhuman method of dealing with the vast spectrum of human conditions. Start from the view of human need, not the departmental budget.
The cuts to PIP were originally proposed by the Chancellor in order to balance the State’s War Budget. The original announcement of £5billion cuts to disability benefits came in April, 2 days after the government announced a £5billion increase in military spending on nuclear weapons. To pay for rearmament, Starmer targeted those at home least able to fight back.
Now, because of a public outcry threatening so many seats of Labour MPs, amendments to the original Bill protect over a million existing PIP claimants and two-and-a-quarter million current UC recipients. But the amendments leave-out 58% of new PIP claimants, 730,000 future UC recipients, 440,000 JSA/ESA claimants on time-limited awards, every disabled person under the age of 22 and every person who becomes disabled in the future.
This is not the “Change” that was promised by Labour at last year’s general election. From November 2026 the safety-net for people with disabilities will be weakened and holed. The new points-system will raise the bar, the criteria to receive help (of up to £110 a week – no King’s ransom) dramatically tightened. The changes are divisive and sinister.
This bastardised two-tier system will find many claimants £5,700 a year worse-off. Why? Because the government is too weak and complicit to chase the super-wealthy individuals and corporations – including the heavily tax-subsidised arms companies – who avoid paying billions in taxes, year after year. It’s the poor who pay the price.
Able people have to fight for the rights of people with disabilities, not least because we never know when we’ll be in need ourselves. The government should scrap its entire welfare bill and start again from principles of social justice, human rights and Welfare not Warfare!