My weekly comment column in the daily Plymouth Herald (4.2.25) hopelessly edited to the 600 word maximum on a subject requiring a massive discourse. The Machine Men with Machine Minds proposing a Machine World are in charge, and we’re at severe risk. Its all part of the system that exploits and oppresses but how do we win that argument? The starting point certainly includes demanding regulation of Artificial Intelligence.

A longer (1,000) unedited version below, or just read the pictured article. Thanks.

Apparently the future is AI! Prime Minister Starmer says so, pledging to devote billions in tax money to the bloated Big Technology Corporations to develop Artificial Intelligence (AI) rather than spending our taxes on real people’s health and welfare, emotional and physical.
Listen, not so fast! There are real concerns about this technology. We are in a system where machines and technology are not serving us, we are serving them.
There’ll be winners and losers as AI takes hold, but very many more losers than winners.
The oligarchs controlling the US now are the tech billionaires who are pushing AI. Of course they would. The Lords in their 21st Century castles, their forefathers having owned the mines and oil wells pushing black gold into every orifice of civilisation. AI is today’s landscape, and as with before, it’s all about making money, damn the impacts.
The 0.1% of the world’s human race are deciding how we, the 99% are going to live our lives. Apparently we’ll all be online all the time, living a virtual reality oblivious to the devastation of everything around us.
The bankers and billionaires are telling us we need more computers and taking our tax-money to fund themselves. AI will only facilitate the National Health Service if you can pay for it. It will take your job.
Computer glitches are annoying, online trolls cause anxiety and depression, disinformation makes of distrustful of everyone else and even ourselves. Overall the amount of stuff we now have, stuffed with computer chips, is not creating more comfort or peace of mind – quite the opposite.
And there are even more chilling effects of this supposed new technological revolution. Those in the know are calling upon governments to urgently debate the threats and ethical difficulties.
Self-programming computers are the equivalent of an alien civilisation landing on earth and placing demands, regulating human behaviours.
Computer scientists are warning that AI is an existential threat to human existence as imminent as war or climate change. Machines are teaching themselves to build systems that think faster and are more intelligent than us.
AI is ramping up new warfare, drones and satellites as mass killing machines, all to the benefit of the military-industrial complex funded by, you guessed it, you, in the name of national security or some such nonsense. The technology of warfare is a cash-cow – the killing is milking it.
More and more, we’re wary of technology and with good reason. The Luddites of the 19th Century were not anti-technology, we smashed the mechanical looms because we wanted the assurances that jobs and pay would be protected. Our movement for workers rights under threat from mill-owners greed was responded to by military repression, incarceration and even execution.
We’re here again. How can humans control the machines to ensure they’re beneficial, not exploitative? Humans are not benign, our “intelligence” has produced an observable total power over all life on earth, a power we abuse. So why wouldn’t a super-computer do the same?
Humans can no longer beat a computer at the game of chess. The capabilities of ChatGPT4, alongside its cheap competitors like DeepSeek are so great that they were not predicted or considered just 5 years ago. Making the computation bigger and bigger creates an entity that is all-but sentient already.
AI is thinking for itself, filtering information very fast and deciding what humans need to be informed of. The bots that decide what adverts we may be interested in have invaded our emails, browsers and social media applications, feeding upon our likes and dislikes to tell us all our needs and desires. But they’re not ours, they are the preferences chosen for us by the corporations who have sold our personal information to the highest bidder. We are now each a product to be bought and sold.
Of course, the working class have always had to sell ourselves, our labour, to survive. Now it is the machines that are faster, cheaper and less quirky than human beings who are deciding our worth. AI represents a change in the nature of jobs.
Starmer offers 13,000 new AI tech jobs but this technology will shut down many more “old” jobs and demote skills. There may be more jobs supervising the hardware but the AI will supervise the workers as “the spy in the cab”, the automated “time-and-motion” performance manager. Computers are not replacing the gruelling dirty physical labour anymore, but instead, the thinking jobs. Watch out middle-managers.
The silicon chip corporations have produced many of the new multi-billionaires who consider themselves personally in-charge of their machines, Musk promoting his fascist texts, Farage and Yaxley-Lennon ramping-up racism supported by Facebook Instagram and Tic-Toc.
There is no regulation or external governance, and given the wholly privatised corporate ownership of AI, who exactly can regulate it and has the power to impose boundaries? How can it be regulated?
The AI bots cannot judge what is true and false. Bots put out false information all the time. Your personal and intellectual property is no longer owned or controlled by you.
The programming is not transparent to outsiders – the companies market the technologies as magical, their company the only trustworthy outlet you should buy from. But the systems are becoming self-programming and therefore even the technicians in the companies can’t say exactly how the big-computers work.
The AI Language Learning Models access 30trillion words of data (more than the total words humanity has ever written) and the programs are evolving. General Purpose AI considers missing information – in other words, GPAI programmes think.
In fact we know more about how the human brain works than how these big computers work.
We need to stop the developments and breathe. We need to think before that human skill is taken from us. Italy has banned ChatGBT to prevent disinformation; China has all-but banned the self-programming General Programming AI.
Far from giving our intelligence away to the transnational computer fiefdoms, Starmer should be putting regulations in place to say that robotics should be programmed only to put-out accurate information. We should be able to choose to opt-in to sharing our information. Why would we trust that the corporations will treat our personal information with respect?
In any case, investing tax billions into western tech is a terrible gamble, the gold-rush burgeoning of new tech companies and apps seeing entrepreneurs beating ChatGT with an app costing a fraction and costing the western stock markets over $1 trillion just last week. The apps have us living in a bubble, the government investment a bubble in itself. Bubbles burst.