Restore Nature – and the Climate – Now!

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly comment column in the daily Plymouth Herald (18.6.24) remonstrating against the silence and denial of all parties standing at an election devoid of debate on the acute seriousness of climate change. I am beside myself with angst and anger at the sheer stupidity and ignorance of candidates so self-obsessed and party-disciplined as to refuse to see what’s happening all around. Don’t give me any lip about caring for the future if you’re not acting, right now, against climate collapse.

Leaders are Protecting the Status Quo

It is in the nature of parliamentary democracy for politicians to argue over day-to-day promises. A couple of pence tax-deduction, more doctors, or so many new homes to be built are references to the continuing crisis of enforced austerity being experienced by the “working poor” (as at least seven million of us are so labelled).

The manifestos and “contracts with the people” all speak of reforming Capitalism when in reality, the entire economic and social system is in a depth of crisis that threatens all stability and, indeed, existence. The ruling class cannot and will not allow reform of their system that is so destructive. The demand to a speedy end to fossil-fuelled production actually represents the demand for the end of Capitalism.

So beneath the empty pledges of careerist individualists tied to the machinery of the Capitalist State lies a deeper ideological intent. The “masses” may be demanding real change, but the politicians are there to protect the status quo.

They insist there can be no real alternative to the current system of capitalism. Whilst the richest 1% become richer still, we, the working class, are expected to believe “there is no money”, “the exchequer is bare”, “it will take two parliamentary terms to turn things around”.

We are already required to vote on the basis that what we have is the best that can be hoped for, and anything better is so far away as to be pie in the sky. More of the same is all we should expect.

Except things are not going to stay the same. Their “stability and growth” is the real pie-in-the-sky. In truth, the next ten years will see such changes as to make today a halcyon dream. Real change is coming, courtesy of the natural environment.

Last week the Secretary General of the United Nations, António Guterres, warned of the deepening climate and ecological catastrophe affecting all nations across the world. He spoke of “planetary destruction” and stated that Governments across all wealthy nations have not kept their previous pledges. Global warming emissions from fossil fuel gases have risen to a new record level last year at a time when they must be halved by 2030 to avoid the worst climate effects.

“It’s we the Peoples versus the polluters and the profiteers,” he said. “Together, we can win. But it’s time for leaders to decide whose side they’re on.”

The speech was a rallying call by a UN leadership concerned that the climate crisis has slipped down the list of priorities. This “slippage”, bordering upon denial, was then proven at the June meeting of the powerful G7 group of countries, where world leaders including the UK Prime Minister repeated the same broken pledges, as if we should believe them this time.

In the real world, record breaking heatwaves were causing death and crop destruction from southern China, through India and North Africa to the southern states of America. 52C was recorded in Delhi, human beings were collapsing amidst water rationing of thirty million people, and monkeys and birds were seen falling from trees, dead from heat exhaustion.

Climatologists in the USA and Europe confirmed evidence that the Gulf Stream is slowing, producing extreme and unpredictable weather patterns. In the UK, despite harvest failures this Spring, the mainstream parties in the election continue to cut their previous pledges on addressing the climate emergency.

Parties of the Right have published manifestos that deny the threat of climate change and call it all a conspiracy.

Working people are worried about the observable changing weather patterns and seasons. We want protections from the threats of flooded homes, transport disruption and high food prices. And our children are most concerned at the very obvious “6th Great Extinction” of insect and animal life taking place as a result of the pollution and heating of our oceans and lands.

Next weekend, against all the political denial and obfuscation, tens of thousands will be marching in London, calling-out to all political candidates to take this overarching issue seriously. ‘Restore Nature Now!” is our serious demand uniting conservationists, environmentalists, climate activists and trade unionists for immediate action to stop environmental destruction. Cut fossil fuel emissions and invest in the living environment!After all, why would anyone vote for extinction?

Nobody Wins in a Nuclear War

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly Comment in the daily Plymouth Herald (11.6.24). I want nuclear-everything (bombs, propulsion, energy, power) discussed during the General Election campaign but can clearly see it is a non-starter in any list of priorities. As, it would appear, is the same for war. Only the protests for Gaza have shaped any election manifesto, the rest being bland re-hashes of out-of-date and incoherent false promises.

The article was edited for publication, the original below.

There are no winners in a nuclear war

Not one Party leader has stated that they shall under no circumstances order the launch of a nuclear weapon. So it can hardly be against the rules of election purdah to argue for unilateral nuclear disarmament when we face such a ghastly future.

We are facing the real possibility of the use of nuclear weapons in the lifetime of the next UK Parliament.

Buried under the sincere emotional weight of commemoration of D-Day 1944, the American President, the de-facto leader of NATO, last week gave approval for US and UK weapons to be fired into and exploded inside Russia. US troops are standing alongside Ukrainians, assisting the launch of high explosives into Russian towns.

Not long before, President Biden had stated on screen that this would never happen, the engagement of NATO forces inside Russia would amount to the start of the Third World War. Yet it’s happening. Have we missed something here? Is everyone in a state of denial?

The more honest of the official military advisers tell us that the present risk of nuclear war is as grave as in 1962 and the early eighties. Some of us remember both periods as a time of breath-holding and anti-nuclear protests.

But not today. It is considered as “woke” to be against the readiness to unleash the Trident-system’s multiple nuclear warheads launched from the UK’s Vanguard nuclear submarines. Indeed, the Plymouth Herald rejoiced at the support of multiple Party-heads to pledge to bring the next generation of nuclear weaponry to Plymouth after the election.

The distraction of nuclear – weapons and power generation – taking much needed cash and skills from the enormous emergencies of both climate and social infrastructure – should be intolerable and exposed as lies.

Instead, “more jobs and more money!” was the parochial proclamation, devoid of any consideration of the impact on jobs and wealth should nuclear weapons ever be used.

And they may well be used, sooner than you think.

The military elite speak of the current escalating nuclear threat and counter-threat pattern, not as an opinion but as fact. There are preparations for resurrecting live nuclear weapon testing by Russia, China and the US. We witness the collapse of arms control measures, the modernisation of weapon systems and the emergence of political leaders fighting over access to the nuclear arsenals and boasting of their readiness to make the “first strike”.

There should be no doubt about the catastrophic reality of nuclear conflict.

The United States’ nuclear arsenal, to which the UK’s bombs are wholly subordinated, contain an Artificial Intelligence programme to deploy a launch-on-warning situation, making the Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (huge nuclear bomb-carrying ICBNs) capable of being launched in as little as one minute—15 minutes for the submarines. There are enough weapons in those positions right now to bring on a nuclear winter that would kill at least 5 billion people. In a nuclear exchange, most people don’t die instantly – most die over a period of weeks or months in extreme agony, dissolved from within by the radioactive fallout.

The talk of “targeted” battlefield weapons is a nonsense of hawkish propaganda. There’s nothing targeted about them – these are weapons of mass destruction deemed illegal in international law. The cynically presented “low-yield” nuclear bombs, with smaller explosive and radioactive fallout footprints than those carried on the ICBNs, are nevertheless the size of that dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. For politicians to speak of their use in Ukraine or Gaza (and yes, active politicians in power have voiced those demands recently) is despicable.

There is only a single target for nuclear weapons – humanity itself. The first use of one nuclear weapon will, most likely, set-off a global chain reaction ordered by automation, not a Prime Minister or President. Britain’s nuclear weapons make us a primary target, as the offensive military commander, President Putin has pointed out.

Existential threats to the very future of the human race need to be understood and addressed in democratic debate. Nuclear war is right up there with climate and bio-diversity collapse. These horrors should be high on the election agenda.

Immediate unilateral disarmament is the only answer. Instead, raising the proportion of military spending, including at least £210billion of tax-payers money for the new nuclear weapons Trident system controlled by the United States, is written in stone in the Party manifestos and boasted for as a vote winner. Why would you vote for nuclear war? It is a war no-one can win.

Election will Not Alter Class-based Society

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My Comment this week in the daily Plymouth Herald (4.6.24). The rigged “balance” required of the media during an election period means I can’t get published what I’d really like to say: Farage’s Reform Party offers an embryonic fascist rally which threatens the entire working class, the Greens are a pro-Capitalist Party with a terrible anti-working class record in Europe and indeed, against trade unions when running local councils; Galloway is socially conservative with adherence to religious family values that opposes a women’s right to choose, gay marriage and trans-rights, his Workers’ Party inviting cross-class alliances with Farage and ex-UKIP  candidates. Starmer is more than ready to lead us into World War Three within the duration of the next Government term (for which the imperialist ruling classes already undertaking the preparations). And anyway, putting one’s faith in bourgoisie democracy and the election of a socialist pro-working class government has been thoroughly destroyed by the ruling class offensive against Corbyn (not to mention the various corporate-funded right-wing coups against socialist reformers across the globe). The Left, historically infiltrated by chancers, turn-coat careerists, renegades, police spies and agent-provocateurs, continues to fragment just when political unease and renewed strike action in our class offers a chance to build a coherent mass organisation. The rise and falls of mass movements: Black Lives Matter; Me Too!; Climate Strikes and now Freedom for Gaza each represent missed opportunities for decisive leadership for whole-system change, linking all the issues together into an anti-Capitalist offensive. It’s no longer any good to say you’re a “socialist” without saying you’re anti-Capitalist. It is Capitalism and its current development of Imperialism that links all these movements and issues. The Capitalists will not allow you to reform their System out of existence! The only way out of this is revolution, which may well be brewing elsewhere in the world for us to jump-on and build here. One mass strike is worth ten general elections!

But none of this can be printed.

So instead, here’s the long version of the printable edition:

The candidates are about to be declared, the stage about to be set. General elections are theatres for Party activists.

People join together into political parties with reason. There are ideas that conjoin and ideas that splinter into opposition. It’s very difficult, for example, to believe in universal human rights whilst promoting racial superiority – is it okay that some people are born with more privileges and entitlements than others?

Some beliefs come together towards a whole and encompassing world view.  To act upon the our formed “way of seeing” we need to join together in sufficient numbers to have impact and change the direction of social organisation towards our preferred conditions. Hence parties.

On a very superficial level, that’s what putting a cross on a piece of paper at election day represents – a personal alliance with a world view.

The current drive towards politicians “independent” of any world view is probably a short-term proposition. A non-Party “independent” may be elected because they catch the majority view on a single issue but soon get into trouble when people disagree with other views they now espouse but were not in their manifesto. 

They may be elected as forthright and unbending on their stated goal, but find that, to achieve anything they will have to compromise into a coalition with others, watering down their mandate and starting to link together into a new political Party. 

The rise of the “Independents” is a necessary reaction to the general sense of “they’re all the same” which has swept into the consciousness of the electorate. The lack of faith in democracy as currently organised is prevalent across the Western world whilst still being fought for in the Global South. 

The point is, there are real differences in preferences for social organisation. There are Right and a Left wings of the political spectrum. Social organisation to share resources to ensure everyone’s needs and human rights are met is a world view and ambition that is the complete opposite of a belief in individual competition and personal enrichment at the expense of others. 

The best example is our National Health Service, loathed by Right-wingers as a construct of “socialism” because people pay into the common purse in order to get free health care at the point of need. The privatisation of the NHS is a right-wing strategy to turn our health service into a fee-paying, for-profit capitalist enterprise run by transnational pharmaceutical companies, not the State.

Any NHS charging essentially separates those who can afford to pay from those who can’t, into a society where your right to health care is based upon your personal income and inherited wealth. To accept charging in order to lower taxes is to accept individual competition as the social norm – a world view with wider implications.

It is difficult to ride on the back of two horses running in opposite directions. There are new parties seeking to go beyond, or bring together, Right and Left, despite the inherent conflict at the core of those ideologies. This may be an honest attempt to rebuild democracy away from the current two-party system which offers no real difference in policies or outcomes. But it’s a project doomed to failure.

A white-supremacist cannot be, at the same time, anti-racist and for a multi-cultural State. Someone who believes men should have power over women is unlikely to defend the rights of LGBTQ+. Warmongers don’t vote for Peace. Anyone who believes that the majority of Muslims are extremist “Islamists” is unlikely to believe in the rights of refugees and asylum seekers. Beliefs coalesce into world views.

The inescapable fact is that we live in a polarised society based upon class, the conditions we are born into determining much of how we see the world and what we believe. We are born into a System, not of our choosing or making, where social policy either benefits the wealthy elite or it benefits the working class and the poor. Either we raise taxes to pay for social need, which requires the rich to pay-up in full, or we collapse the State and engage with a dog-eat-dog system where those without are left to perish. 

History provides many examples of where this class conflict which produces trade union strikes, mass movements, protests and community campaigns, produce real social changes far more profound and more often than general elections. 

So the core question to candidates should be, are you for the People (the majority of whom are working class reliant upon day-to-day income) or the Rich ruling class few who extract and exploit in order to maintain their privileges? Everything else stems from this divide. Whatever the result, we’ll still have to fight for our rights.

Support the Students for Gaza!

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly Comment in the daily Plymouth Herald (28.6.24). This week, Ireland, Spain and Norway added their names to the growing list of countries demanding a Palestinian State. The backlash from the Israeli government supported by Biden and Sunak was disgusting, suggesting these countries are on the side of terrorists, as if the genocide being continued by Israel is not terrorism. 

You see, the trick is to accuse your enemy of precisely the crime you are committing. The deceit is formidable. To suggest that we who campaign for ceasefire, peace and freedom for Palestine are racist is quite a trick. The campaign  for Gaza has defeat of racism at its core.

Step, for four minutes, into our boots. 

Every Saturday for the past 7 months we have protested in Plymouth. Indeed, millions have combined into a single movement across the world across those months, to stop the genocide taking place in Palestine. 

We are approached by people with all sorts of views. Many offer support, some money for the Medical Aid to Palestine charity, much needed now every hospital in Gaza has been bombed and demolished. Some tell of us of their links.

And some come to attack us. Only a tiny minority offer such vitriol, the vast majority agreeing that the killing of Palestinian civilians has to stop. But they offer arguments for supporting the whole scale destruction of Gaza, the killing of 37,000 civilians including 12,000 children, the shooting and bombing that has caused over 80,000 casualties, and the preventing of food, clean water or fuel that is now causing the starvation of 1.5 million crammed into tented spaces amidst the rubble without any facilities. observers close to the ground are suggesting that over 100,000 have died, many of the bodies uncountable or unidentifiable and therefore unconfirmed.

It has become obvious that the far-Right in Plymouth, and Britain, and across the world, has rallied to the Israeli cause. The contradiction is historic. It was the far-Right fascist regime of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists who perpetrated the Holocaust – the focussed and industrial organisation of extermination of more than six-and-a-half million Jews rounded-up from across Europe and systematically murdered in the cause of seeking racial purity and supremacy of the Aryan white-race, whoever they were invented to be.

Those protesting for Gaza today are the same people who have always challenged racism and fascism, exposing the horror of the Holocaust and demanding “Never Again”. We oppose antisemitism and organise to protect the rights of Jewish People alongside every other cultural and ethnic grouping. The right to follow a Faith has to be a fundamental human right.

However, the right to impose your religion on others has no basis at all. No-one can be forced to believe, only to pretend to follow a faith for survival’s sake. Only you can know what you truly believe. 

Consequently, creating a nation state where the belief in one religion endows you with rights and privileges denied to others must also be unacceptable. The Israeli State has developed a constitution and set of laws for a single ethnic group to be defined as citizens, and all others to be secondary with fewer rights. 

Students are revolting! Everywhere!

There are more than thirty encampments on university grounds across Britain, including in Exeter and Falmouth in our far South-West, mirroring many more in the USA and Europe. Their cause is simple – freedom for the people of Palestine.

The international demand for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and for immediate aid and reparations for the millions of Palestinians experiencing deliberate and enforced starvation has majority support.

Yet, over the weekend, more Gazan civilians were killed and injured as Israeli troops bombed makeshift camps in Rafah, a refugee city on the very western edge of Palestine, bordering Egypt.

Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide, the people had been herded there in the first place at the barrel of a gun, told this was the safest place only to then be shot at and bombed from above.

There can be no excuse for this military offence. The actions of the Israeli Defence Force working to the orders of the Israeli government defy and break all international law on the conduct of war and treatment of displaced civilians.

The concerns of students and young people across the world should be heard. The International Criminal Court has demanded an immediate ceasefire, and issued an arrest warrant for the Israeli Prime Minister. The United Nations and International Court of Justice has identified acts of genocide    Continuing today. 

The UN says that 1200 Israelis and 37,000 Palestinian civilians have been killed including 16,000 children since October 7th last year. All hospitals in Gaza have been destroyed, and supplies of water and food prevented from reaching most, who have no shelter amidst the bombing of the entire region. 

Last week, Ireland, Spain and Norway added their names to the 137 countries recognising Palestine as a country and demanding the withdrawal of Israel’s occupying forces. Palestine has the right to exist, as it did before the creation of Israel in 1948 when terrorists invaded Palestinian land, shot and forced 750,000 inhabitants to leave their homes and become refugees. This Catastrophe, The Nakba, has been now repeated and amplified through 2024. 

Support for Gaza and freedom for Palestine represents a global cry for justice and human rights. Students are to the fore in taking action everywhere to stop this illegal war. It’s simple. If there is no justice for Palestine, there is no justice anywhere. 

Students campaign on many issues – for affordable and decent housing here, for access to food and medical care for children across Britain, for the right of all to education. For Peace, not war. These demands cannot be limited to Britain when billions of pounds of our taxes are being spent waging war and destruction on people elsewhere. We have to protest when our own educational establishments are making money out of genocide abroad.

Israel has bombed and flattened every university in the Palestinian Territories, yet most of our universities still invest in Israeli businesses and many have direct business dealings with the Israeli military. Our students have a simple demand – Stop Arming Israel! And one-by-one, universities are divesting from Israel, heeding their students’ moral demands. 

Trade unions, most of which have long supported Palestinian independence, must now act to support our youth. In Oxford, university authorities used Police to arrest peaceful protesters and uphold the university’s links with Israeli war crimes. Our response should be to defend the college encampments and demand a boycott of all military aid to Israel. 

When one country is allowed to enslave another, no-one can claim to be free. Permanent ceasefire now and Freedom for Palestine! Support our Students!

Julian Assange should be set free – now!

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly Comment in the daily Plymouth herald (21.5.24). Individuals can rarely claim responsibility for changing the course of history, and those that can are usually tyrants to be deposed. But some individuals symbolise a political cause or movement or call-to-action that makes them headline news, perhaps despite themselves and in any case for political demands far more important than themselves. so to champion Assange’s case is not to glorify the individual, although his tenacity and then his own suffering should deserve empathy and concern from us all. This is about the freedom of press versus censorship, the public “right to know”, the public interest, the continuation of war crimes in the name of western imperialism that is now ramping-up again towards a third world war. So the demand for freedom for Assange is of critical importance, even more so for our own futures than for his.

The meme screamed out, “if I were lying, no-one would be trying to silence me!” And so his Appeal continues. But he should be set free, now!

The treatment of Julian Assange, Australian journalist, has certainly been aimed at ensuring his silence. Alleged, under US law more than a century old, of being a spy, he has been incarcerated in Belmarsh prison, London, coined as “Hellmarsh” by Jeffrey Archer who spent four years there. Human Rights activists are routinely imprisoned there, making Bellmarsh the symbol for Britain’s political prisoners.

As with Guantanamo Bay, Bellmarsh is globally notorious for detention of suspects without charge, with a brutal regime without any element of comfort or congregation. Assange has no criminal charges under UK law, yet faces charges if extradited to the USA. The most powerful nation in human history has stretched out the long arm of it’s internal laws across the Atlantic as if UK, and indeed Australian, citizens are all subjugated under the dictates of the evil empire.

Assange’s “crime” was exposing atrocities committed by the US in the Afghan and Iraq wars. Information provided by US Army Intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to Wikileaks from 2010 and 2011 included around 750,00 documents.

They revealed how the US military killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents during the war in Afghanistan, alongside military videos from the Iraq war showing a total of 66,000 civilians being killed. Assange, as an investigative journalist, thought the public should know.

Were Assange to be ultimately found guilty in the USA, the most vital journalistic freedoms would also be criminalised, including the requirement to divulge sources of information, ending all rights to confidentiality or protection of identity. 

This importance of journalistic search for and exposure of the Truth in war is as pertinent as ever amid today’s deepening military tensions. We all know that the protection of “state secrets” is used as the excuse for a constant propaganda streaming of untruths by every government on earth, including our own. 

In the absence of substantiated facts we are at the predatory mercies of conspiracy theorists. Citizens are the last to know what’s actually taken place. What’s the real story behind the death of President and Foreign Minister of Iran at the weekend? How many children have actually been killed in Gaza. Is the figure higher or lower than the United Nations estimates of 37,000 civilian non-combatants so far? 

How do we decide whether to trust the statements from the UN or the UK? If we choose to believe war propaganda, are we also choosing to believe lies told us about “the enemy within” – the daily government-sponsored stream of false threats to our welfare at the hands of refugees, welfare benefit claimants and trade unionists?

This is not only a question of whether we, the ordinary working class masses, have a “right to know” or not. It is about the consequences for us of allowing governments to perpetrate and act upon flagrant lies in their own interests, not ours. The Iraq war happened because of lies, the mass murders of civilians condoned because of lies, and the subsequent destabilisation of Arab states only continuing because of our State’s lies.

Assange’s only true crime was his own naivety. Of course “they” would seek to shut him down by any means necessary. It’s what they do. It is only when we stand hand-in-hand and shoulder-to-shoulder in our millions that “they” feel threatened enough to back-off from their own imperial ambitions. That’s why all of us who care about the rights of citizenry, the pursuit of democracy and freedom, should care about Assange. And more, we should demand the facts, not the spin. Investigative journalism, however much in short supply, is not a crime.

Heading into Strife

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly Comment int he daily Plymouth Herald (14.5.24) seeking to expose the “disaster capitalism” manifesto of Rishi Sunak, ex-hedge fund manager who made millions out of the global financial crash of 2008. It is difficult to say “corrupt”, “gangster”, “liar” and “spiv” of a Prime Minister and get it published. Nevertheless, my hatred of Sunak and his billionaire class has to be broadcast by whatever means necessary.

The Prime Minister began this week by warning that the next five years will see fundamental changes to the way of life in Britain. What could he be speaking of?

The beleaguered Sunak predicts more will change in the next five years than in the last 30.

“I’m convinced that the next few years will be some of the most dangerous yet most transformational our country has ever known.”

It sounds more like a threat than a promise. The signs are there. Tensions inside this country and across the world are ramping-up exponentially. Governments are responsible for the highest levels of corruption and self-interest, using propaganda mechanisms of nationalism and racism to maintain social control by setting us each against the other. 

All the time the politicians are managing the plundering of the tax-payers’ coffers and extracting record profits from all the necessities of life, our where-with-all being hoarded into the private off-shore bank accounts of the super-rich.

Internationally we are seeing deepening and entrenched warfare, Britain being drawn on the coat tails of the United States of America into direct engagement in Ukraine and Palestine, Africa and the South China Seas. Little wonder more tax money will be diverted to the military and away from spending on social welfare at home.

And no wonder that more millions of human beings are being forced to seek asylum, to migrate from their homelands, forced by everything from ethnic cleansing and genocides to climate collapse. 

The climate emergency has turned already into catastrophe for hundreds of millions across what is politically termed the “Global South” – those regions that have seen labour and natural resources plundered for the benefit of the nations of the North. Their crisis is coming our way, fast.

The climate changes that are killing millions each year are now hitting us. In Britain, eight months of record breaking rain represents new and less predictable patterns of extremes, in temperature, precipitation, meteorological seasons and the power of extreme weather events.

The unique speed of the rise in global temperatures is causing not only food shortages but the spread of disease. The classic killers and disabling infections of hot climates, such as malaria and Lyme disease are here now, brought north by warmer conditions by mosquitos and ticks, and fungal spores. 

The economic inequalities caused by harvest collapse, food shortages and transport disruption caused by both war and climate change will only produce more poverty, war and global warming.

So, sad as it is to admit, Sunak is correct. We are heading into social strife. 

What is left unsaid is that this is all the doing of Sunak and his Capitalist ilk, as part of the global political class and their Corporate masters who have created all these conditions: funding wars to reap massive profits for the arms manufacturers and fossil fuel companies; denying and investing billions in propaganda campaigns against the science of climate change and effective remedies; demanding tax-billions for pharmaceutical companies to cherry-pick the most lucrative vaccine markets and disregard the rest; and the super-rich driven by avarice, ready to make a short-term profit at the expense of the future of humanity.

The single most noticeable change we will experience over the next 5 years is the intensification of authoritarianism, whatever the party of government. More punishments for strikers and protesters daring to challenge all the above and demand investment in the future of humanity. More intense political repression is inevitable, that is, unless we increase protests now to protect democracy and force the political change we need. 

Right now, the students are leading the way!  Show them every support! Turn up with food and water, send them money, protect them from assault. Build the Resistance!

Heat Strikes not Heat Strokes

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly Comment published in the Plymouth Herald newspaper on 7th May 2024, urging the trade unions to take-up the call for maximum temperatures in workplaces, and for union reps to negotiate protections with employers. The trade unions, matching the leadership of the Labour Party, have detracted from organising on the issue of Climate Change and the impacts from the consequent extreme weather, and this has to change. Unions will have to challenge the Labour leadership ahead-of and immediately after the Party’s victory at the upcoming General Election. We must organise for that, now! PS, the weather is scorching hot today!

The ground is drying out at last. Local farmers are sowing and planting, seeking to supply us as well as compensate themselves for the over-winter losses.

We’ve had extreme levels of wet weather, already most of the average annual rainfall by the beginning of May. The soil has been too wet to work without destroying its composition, the winter crops rotting. 

This is just another example of The Change. No-one is honestly denying that Climate Change is with us, even if those wedded to fossil fuels and their private SUV’s want to argue against the cause. 

The speed and scale of change is not natural. Global warming is caused by the massive emission of gases, CO2, nitrous oxide and methane overwhelmingly produced by human methods of production, that trap heat inside the atmosphere causing land and sea to warm and expand, emitting more heat-trapping gases. 

The result is more extreme weather and the extreme shifts between weather patterns. One minute drenching down pours, the next, skin-burning heat. At a global level, deserts may be suddenly flooded, as in Dubai last week, or flood plains quickly turn to dust as in some southern states of the USA. 

The British Isles has seen the wettest winter and spring alongside it being the one of the warmest in record. The global heating creates more evaporation across the Atlantic and that produces more precipitation, rain to fall down on us. It’s going to get warmer but wetter, and most importantly, less predictable.

Nevertheless, every time the sun peers through the increasingly heavy and dark clouds, newspapers will carry front page news proclaiming “What a Scorcher!” with photographs of families lounging on beaches. Rubbish!

The majority of us will be at work, whatever the weather or time of year. And those outside will be at increasing risk of sun burn.

The extremes of weather will produce extremes of temperature, with unprecedented heights of heat waves becoming more frequent in the UK. 

High temperatures can be fatal for many elderly people, infants, disabled people and also workers exposed to heat for long periods.

The lack of health and safety regulations in the UK means that there are laws on working in the cold – minimum workplace temperatures below which you’d can stop work – but no laws on the maximum temperature. 

In recent years, because of global warming, heatwaves across the USA and Europe have led to the deaths of workers either in the outdoors or in extremely hot workplaces – building sites and kitchens are two examples, but glass sided office blocks are just as risky. 

It should be clear that the warming climate and heatwaves are trade union issues. Workers now require protection from extreme weather. 

Here’s some examples. If we are prevented from getting to work by transport disruption, or the workplace is unusable by flooding, our contracts should ensure we still get paid. If the workplace is too hot (much above 22 degrees Celsius) we should be sent home, and if we work from home, the employer should supply the air-conditioning to prevent over-heating. 

Union representatives have to be sitting with employers now to agree “conditions of service” – workplace conditions, that recognise the impacts of extreme or severe weather and protect the workforce. 

And for all the naysayers and climate deniers who consider such health and safety as woke, just look around you. A few years ago every time we had a heatwave people used to go out and sunbathe. Now, we sit in the shade under the trees, where they’re still standing, because the heat is becoming uncomfortable. 

If our employers refuse to invest in safe work conditions we should protect ourselves by joining together and refusing to suffer the discomfort. Instead of risking heat strokes, we should organise heat strikes!

If the debate isn’t based upon Class, it is Fatally Flawed

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly article for May Day in the daily Plymouth Herald newspaper (30.4.24), identifying the continuing bosses’ offensive against workers, locally and globally. I would like to openly attack and expose the role of the trade union bureaucracy in Britain and across the world, continually protecting Capitalism from open challenge, separating economics from politics in order to curb the anger and action of organised workers. But the column is offered on behalf of the Plymouth TUC, and I therefore fall upon my own sword, a victim of the contradictions inherent in fighting for Peace with Social Justice from inside the System.

It is almost as if we are not supposed to speak about class anymore. Yet, whatever social concern is being discussed has to sit within the context of class.

We live in a society and a human world based upon social class. The class we are born into determines most of our life chances and is where we will stay – there has been almost no social mobility over the last 50 years in Britain.

The working class is by far the largest. More than half the world’s population is now reliant upon the income from gainful employment. We are the people required to work for a weekly or monthly or precarious dribs-and-drabs wage. Rather than being forced to work as a slave, we are forced to sell our abilities and hope someone will give us a job as a wage-slave.

Low wages often force us to hold down number of jobs at once, all juggled between domestic care responsibilities and patchy sleep.

In the West, wages for the majority have fallen in terms of real-spending power since 2008, while corporate profits have soared. In the southern states of the USA, wage rates have fallen so far that Chinese companies are moving businesses there to exploit the working classes now cheaper than Chinese workers at home. 

Britain, racing to be the USA’s 51st State is following suit, our social infrastructure betrayed by privatisation is catching-up with the ghetto conditions and collapsed bridges of America.

In challenging all this, trade unions continue to struggle to organise workplaces against exploitation, for decent wages and conditions, workers’ health and safety, and social justice in our communities.

Unions are hated by many. Middle Class property owners despise the notion of human rights that demands responsibilities and liabilities of those with towards those without. Shareholders and corporate executives want to tame or smash unions as every penny extra won for the worker is a penny less for their private profits. And successive governments have created laws limiting trade union activities to a minimum.

Tomorrow, more than one billion workers across the globe will actively celebrate International Workers Day, 1st May.

We will be celebrating the organisations of workers on every continent, combining to prevent unscrupulous employers from gross exploitation, expropriation of our skills and knowledge, profiteering from our hard labour, and oppressing us with unbridled bullying and domination.

Unionised workplaces have better workers’ rights. Unions challenge all forms of discrimination, organise against racism and sexism, for Trans Rights, for the rights of the disabled, and for peace not war. 

We negotiate to protect workers from the threats to life from the deepening climate emergency caused by the careless chaos of capitalist production at the expense of all life on earth.

There has been a backlash that we call a “bosses offensive”, driving down expectations and beating back work-life balance, our younger generations suffering a new intensity of “wage-slavery” and precarious employment, ever fearful of subsistence on treadmill of Universal Credit.

Trade unions here have fought back, and continue to do so with the support of the majority of the population, despite any and every inconvenience caused. 

There is a very crying, painful need for a working class assault against the greed and avarice of the employing class – the real ruling class of this country, pillaging all the essential services. A reunification of shoulder-to-shoulder solidarity across all industries and nations. 

A worker in Britain today has more in common with a worker in Mumbai or Beijing than with any of the politicians in Parliament, the millionaire TV celebrities or the corporate billionaires. 

We celebrate International Workers Day, and organise for peace with social justice.

Plymouth Trades Union Council is celebrating May Day with a festival on Saturday 4th May, marching with banners at midday in the city centre and rallying at the Athenaeum Theatre in the afternoon, with campaign stalls and the free showing of the Ken Loach film, “The Old Oak”.

And every day thereafter, union representatives will be there, organising with and for you. Join a Union!

Shame of Enforced Extradition from UK

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

This week’s comment from me in the daily Plymouth Herald (23.4.24), hopefully timely in terms of this being the day when the Rwanda Bill becomes a law-defying law, and at least 6 people are drowned trying to reach Britain from France in small boats confronted by French coastguards. Until there is safe passage, there is no justice.

The law of forced extradition will come into play this week. In the next 12 weeks, a chosen handful, against their will and agency, may be taken to a place of departure by armed guards, and transported by plane to a country they have no links to and no rights within.

Rwanda has a recent record of human rights abuses. 

Five years ago the Rwandan police opened fire on refugees protesting. Rwandan security forces shot dead at least 12 refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo when they protested against a cut to food rations.

Authorities arrested and prosecuted over 60 of them on charges including “spreading false information with intent to create a hostile international opinion against the Rwandan state”. These same laws could be used against the people Britain now wants to pluck from south coast beaches and dump in Africa.

On 15th January this year, documents sent to MPs by home secretary James Cleverly admitted that “While Rwanda is now a relatively peaceful country, there are nevertheless issues with its human rights record around political opposition to the current regime, dissent and free speech.”

Absurdly, Four Rwandan asylum seekers were granted refugee status in the UK last year over “well-founded” fears of persecution. Rwanda is not a safe refuge.

Indeed, polls posted by Al Jazeera show widespread concern inside Rwanda about the refugees and the Treaty with Britain. The Rwandan economy is in crisis, there is mass unemployment and no jobs, and a housing crisis similar to that of the UK. 

Rwanda has not implemented all the promises it made in the Treaty with the British State, which has so far cost the tax-payer £340million, with estimates of the numbers of refugees likely to be extradited reaching a cost of over £1,500,000 per person.

The new Act breaks many other laws governing law-making! It prevents courts from considering laws which protect human rights and the safety of individuals. It is a law of political imposition, overriding justice, that is the hallmark of a totalitarian state.

The only rational way to understand this despicable law is as a part of a wider intensification of the racist ‘hostile environment’, openly admitted to and quoted by the previous Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, who now criticises the Rwanda Act as too soft!

Given that the Rwanda Law makes no sense, it can only be understood as a racist law forced through by a racist government. It is an ideological pledge to a small core-group of ultra nationalist white supremacists who will salivate over the public execution of punishments for those seeking refuge. It is not the trafficking gangs who will be exposed or deposed. After all, we live in a Free Market economy which values and celebrates entrepreneurs!

Clearly, the racists want us to blame refugees for all the ills of Britain today. Whilst the far-Right criticise social conditions in Britain they do not support State intervention and taxation to eradicate poverty. They may also attack the Establishment’s intelligentsia, but they support unbridled Capitalism. This is why the scapegoating of “outsiders”, “The Other” is their primary target, their violent hatred as seen at various hostels and hotels focussed upon migrants they deem “illegal”.

Their dominant theme seeks to prevent and make invisible the real causes of the destruction of our country’s welfare state and infrastructure, which is causing misery for millions of UK citizens. 

The scale of deprivation and poverty here is far too great to be possibly caused by the numbers of asylum seekers arriving by flimsy boats or lorry chassis. 

The cost to the country of corrupt deals, tax-evasion by and unconscionable tax-handouts to the super-rich outweighs the cost of refuge 10,000,000-1. 

Shell and BP profits at over £40billion, paying less than 10% in tax despite the average worker here returning a total of nearly 40% of earnings in taxation. British Gas increased its surplus 10-fold whilst millions of us ration our heating due to fuel poverty. 

Tesco made £1.5billion profit from charging inflated prices for food whilst 2 million of us are reliant upon charitable food banks, 4 million UK children suffering poverty.

The water industries paid out £70bn to shareholders whilst overseeing degradation to a point of sewage pollution in every one of our rivers.

None of this is caused by refugees and asylum seekers, how could it be? None of these refugees are CEOs or shareholders. They have nothing. Yet the working class are told to blame and indeed hate them rather than the inhuman billionaires whose private wealth has increased by nearly 50% since 2020 by exploiting us. 

No human being can be deemed “illegal” – we are each subject to the lottery of being born somewhere unchosen. Only behaviours can be described as illegal according to law, and seeking to live isn’t a felony. Becoming super-rich off the backs of the poor is certainly a a crime, or should be.

The Rwanda Act must be repealed as part of a complete turn-around of our priorities and policies. Tax the Corporate Rich, put the welfare of all first and foremost, and ensure safe passage. Refugees are Welcome Here!

Third World War is a Real threat

Tony StauntonLeave a comment

My weekly column in the Plymouth Herald (16.4.24) linking the various recent quotes from Grant Shapps, Kier Starmer, Sharon Graham and Rishi Sunak but without naming them during this period of electoral party-political media purdah (space wouldn’t allow for inclusion of Biden and Netanyahu). The signs of war are with us. The plans are being laid, whilst a single error of judgement of mistake could start the conflagration now. Organise to Stop the War!

The unedited version below:

Historians can describe the signs of coming war: crisis of economy, class tensions at home, scarcity of resources, competition for land and food, pestilence and poverty forcing mass migration.

But war does not begin before they’ve built their armies. War needs advanced planning, not just of the military hardware but of the emotional commitment of the populations involved.

Politicians need to begin making carefully contrived propaganda speeches years in advance. Allying the individual citizen with national interests is a starting point.

Identifying and detailing the alien nature of ‘The Enemy” and broadcasting their atrocities is an essential prerequisite to the conscription of the population ready to fight and kill the subhuman hoards threatening all borders.

The guns and tanks, fighters and mass uniforms must be produced well in advance. New factories have to be built, paid for by a raise in the tax percentage of the Gross Domestic Profit siphoned-off for weapons in spite of any other social concerns and needs of the day.

A sense of national pride must be reestablished, especially if the nation has, to date, been internationalist and multicultural. This can take years and years. Friends who enjoy a variety of cultural lifestyles or faiths have to be set against each other. A new hierarchy of acceptable and unacceptable behaviours and beliefs must be enforced, mirroring the nations’ elite.

This takes a concerted effort that crosses all other political drives within the ruling class. There has to be governance that espouses national unity to the masses – the working class. Corporations that are in constant competition can unite in favour of the flag, even while seeking fresh profits inside a war economy.

Politicians begin public statements early on. Some of their kites fly immediately, others need to be thrown-up over and over again on the run. A likely lad, easily disposed of if scorned and derided by public opposition, has to be chosen to say, for example, “we are moving from a post-war to a pre-war world”, and “Britain needs to be prepared for war”. Now.

It’s important that the Leader of the Opposition agrees, amplifying the call that the tax-payer must “raise the UK’s defence spending to 2.5% of GDP as soon as resources allow”.

Better still, outdo the policies of the current Party of government. Emphasise the barbarity of the Enemy. Expel the anti-imperialists. Promise to extend and accelerate current development of weapons of mass destruction. Ultimate support for, say nuclear weapons, should trump all other pledges.

All tensions between employees and employers, profiteers and wage-slaves, must be eliminated, class consciousness replaced with nationalist fervour.

Most vitally, the spokespeople for the working class – the people who will be transferred into military uniforms to die for King and Country or be moved to essential military production – must be forcefully cajoled into accepting the changes and bundled into common effort for the coming conflagration.

Trade union leaders have that role to play, primarily to oppose and isolate all anti-warfare activists inside their ranks. In park until they must witchhunt “groups that look to build networks inside trade unions to undermine the defence industry. Jobs for death must replace jobs for life.

An enormous degree of top-down propaganda promoting the need for war is needed because working class people know war is no good.

There has to be a period of one-off clashes, escalating violence and heightened tension between the opposing sides in order to prove that war is essential. Alliances need to be formed and tested between nations before the global war begins.

An enormous amount of top-down propaganda promoting the need for war is required because working class people know that war is no good. The doubters have to be identified as “The Enemy Within”.

War doesn’t make life better for us. Mostly, we die. A military economy is one of shortages and rationing, the absence of welfare, long queues for medical aid or charitable distribution of food aid.

War does make big money for the arms manufacturers and their big shareholders. On all sides. It produces long-term suffering for the rest.

It is time, in fact past time, for a fresh movement against war. The signs are with us, echoing the pre-war years of 1912-14 or 1937-39. The Third World War will dwarf the 70 million deaths of the last world war. All the efforts of those who care for the future of humanity have to combine to prevent the current drive to world war.

May be an image of map and text